mos basic of facts. > peter baker, susan paige, thank you to all of you. adam schiff will be joining halle jackson with the latest on the house investigation today at 3:00. elizabeth holmes once celebrated as the first self made female billionaire was found guilty last night. she was charged with exaggerating what were blood testing machines could use. they acquitted her on different charges of defrauding patients. likely to be served concurrently. kids with covid, a frightening
came out in the trial and the reporting is the technology never worked like she said it did. it was limited to what it could do and instead, she was using conventional blood testing machines that any other lab testing company could use. but was not being transparent about that and so it started to unravel as they reported on it and other legal consequences followed. the wall street journal s reporting has been unbelievable. what is next in terms of sentencing? sentencing will follow, first we have the three counts that the jury did not reach consensus on, and in the coming weeks they will have hearings about it and the government could retry them, it seems like it could be unlikely given that they did have some guilty verdicts but we will find out, sentencing will be likely months from now. she faces a maximum of 20 years from the counts she was found guilty on. stacking is not likely in these cases but we will see what kind of sentencing they suggest, it could be months away.
it is. can you explain for those that have not been following it, can you try to explain what happened with theranos. she arose in 2003, it s been more than a decade. it was really, captured the imagination because elizabeth holmes was very intriguing. it was an image that captivated people and what she said was captivating. she said, hey, i can eliminate the large vial of bloods and take a finger prick and test for a couple hundred health conditions with it and people wanted the technology to work. it was a start-up that had a lot of hype and had hundreds of millions dollars and what with came out in the trial and the reporting is the technology never worked like she said it did. it was limited to what it could do and instead, she was using conventional blood testing machines that any other lab
because he s clear, he s articulate, he s educated, and he doesn t lie, that s a good start! i think he s useless, to be quite honest. i don t think he s got any sort of idea of what labour voters are looking for. he s~~ i wouldn t vote for him. i voted labour all my life, but i wouldn t vote for him. i i think he comes across as a veryl genuine and honest man but i have great difficulty understanding i exactly which direction he wants to go in or what he wants to do. labour mps insist sir keir has set the party on the right path. they know they ll have to do more than wait for government slip ups. vicki young, bbc news, west bromwich. an american tech entrepreneur who claimed her health company could diagnose a range of medical conditions with a simple blood test has been found guilty of fraud. a jury in california convicted elizabeth holmes on four counts of tricking investors. at one point, her company theranos was valued at $9 billion, but it collapsed after a newspaper investiga