Here. Hillis. Here. Johnson. Here. Moore. Here. Richards. Here. And for the recreation and Park Commission. Buell. Here. Low. Here. Lef. And mcdonnell have an excused absence. Thank you, commissioners. Under your special calendar, please note that the joint commissions will hold one public hearing for the public to provide testimony on all items listed below, including consideration of whether to certificate the eir. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will consider action on certificating the final Impact Report and the recreation and Park Commission will act jointly to consider raising the shadow limit for the park, and the Recreation Commission will consider making a recommendation to the Planning Commission, regarding the possible, adverse effect on the park, and following action on those items. The recreation and Park Commission will adjourn. And the Planning Commission will remain in session, and separately consider, action on all other entitlements. Item one, c
15 minute break. Good morning welcome to the for Planning Commission regular hearing october 23, 2014, id like to remembered members that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind devices. And and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Ill have to ask those of you standing please find a seat please thank you very much commissioners we left off on item 11 for 436 central after a conditional use authorization. Commissioner hillis i need to ask for a are you custodial i live on the same block. Move to recuse commissioner hillis. On that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu thank you, commissioners you are here by recused. Good afternoon mary radius woods of departmental staff this is for a prior conditional use authorization that was approved in 2007 in order for the sponsor to extend the hours of operation from an overnight
15 minute break. Good morning welcome to the for Planning Commission regular hearing october 23, 2014, id like to remembered members that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind devices. And and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Ill have to ask those of you standing please find a seat please thank you very much commissioners we left off on item 11 for 436 central after a conditional use authorization. Commissioner hillis i need to ask for a are you custodial i live on the same block. Move to recuse commissioner hillis. On that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu thank you, commissioners you are here by recused. Good afternoon mary radius woods of departmental staff this is for a prior conditional use authorization that was approved in 2007 in order for the sponsor to extend the hours of operation from an overnight
Below the third floor. But, i am confused because one building is only two stories. I think that was correct and there is a discrepancy on the plans, and the floor plans do not show what if any light wells exist on the adjacent building and i think that one of the issues that we had in reviewing this, since keeping the walls would the board like to see the light well extended further down to match. Would i like to see it match all light wells. But i dont need it to go down if there is no light wells. But you would like to see it match, all of the existing light wells at all levels . Yeah. Okay. Okay. Procedural, please . Yeah, absolutely, commissioner i am not going to argue this, and the only, couple of points that i would just like to ask for the board, is we do have a group of folks on the other side. Both due to liability as well as just simple reasons, we asked that maybe one person from the appellant scene be selected to be a part of that and that that person speak on behalf of t
Planning department and that i think we already stated kind of our analysis and our concerns related to section, 317 on the planning code and the department knows that this is properly before the board for your decision and you are trying to resolve this in a matter that is trying to resolve and address the concerns in the safe and ha bitable building and but i will, let me raise two points because that has also been made as part of the wish list and i am not supportive of getting rid of the set back on the third floor. I think that that is a standard of the bench of the design lines and it reduce its from the street and i would like to keep that. And the other thing is that there are no light wells shown on the existing floor plans for the two adjacent buildings below the third floor. But, i am confused because one building is only two stories. I think that was correct and there is a discrepancy on the plans, and the floor plans do not show what if any light wells exist on the adjacen