just for the summations now, you can t bring the president there for the whole trial because people say, well, doesn t he have better things to do than sit here for a week, but for summations for a few hours, it would not have been inappropriate to do that s interesting. so you think a president biden being in there would have been helpful? i m sure that discussion was had between the biden family and abbe lowell and they decided against it. and i can understand there are reasons to decide against it, but if you do bring the president there, it does show respect for the system that he s there sitting as a father interested in the fate of his son, but he s not there. and you would have to acknowledge it. he s not there as the president of the united states he s there as the father of hunter biden? yeah. i mean, it is remarkable. abbe lowell going 90 minutes today with the jury was closing their eyes and some points. is that a bad sign look, it s it s not great, but you
felt emboldened. they thought they were right that day. and even if you look at the latest filings he said that just happened with the proud boys, they re calling donald trump because the most powerful person on planet earth, you know, depending on what continent or country is asking the question, but here in america the most powerful person is the president. and if he s giving the orders to do something, of course you re going to feel emboldened to do it. that s why i felt it was dangerous for him to be on for an anchor to excuse me, for an executive to say we can t have him on because they knew how dangerous it was. i don t get into people who say they use these blanket statements to support the police, defund the police, whatever, i don t get into all of that. people use it as talking points and that s all they do. they use these phrases and
it s one thing if there lyrics signal information or knowledge of a crime that the only person who could have committed it would have known, that in of itself is a different set of circumstances, but blanket statements they are making in the course and scope of their lyrics is not something that prosecutors should be using in court. we should not overlook that we are looking at a particular genre of music, stigmatized as being violent and something that is oftentimes used to fuel existing stereotypes. and even to create new ones, even unjustifiably of course. do you think the stigma or the way in which people have traditionally come to understand over the course of these modern musical history, rap music, the shiner itself itself is on trial at times quite absolutely, genre has been on trial almost since the inception, is the point in which it entered into the mainstream populace of the attention that came with it,
republican senators what the fbi is doing with these whistle blowers coming out and saying you got to look into hunter biden, it is very disturbing evidence we re seeing. harris: i don t know we ve gotten to the point where the president will feel comfortable acknowledging this investigation is something people are looking into, it is hard for the white house to say blanket statements and they still haven t admitted the lap top was legitimate. well, personally i believe if there is wrongdoing by hunter biden and seem to be vigorous investigation going on out of delaware into finances, he should be held accountable and members of the fbi committed infractions, should be punished, as well. i don t think many people would disagree with that, we are on the same page in terms if people should be punished for
that will send republicans or conservatives running away from any kind of conversation. we ve got a supreme court case that is on the books at about to come out and that s going to give us more guidance on this balance between individual rights and reasonabl regulation of firearms but this they were going to take when weapons of war, but weapons of war is the congressman talking about. there are no automatic weapons being used by civilians. the weapons of people are using that look like guns are used by the military but they are functionally the same weapons i hunting rifles. it may be the case that there might be restrictions on the sides of magazines or the amoun of ammunition that can be thought. it is case-by-case regulation great summation i ve regulation and to make blanket statements, were just going to take with certain class of guns. i think you are bright. that is going to raise politica opposition and it s going to ru into the second amendment and could be the kind of thin