united states government has information to indicate that individuals tied to terrorist groups in syria have already attempted to gain access to our country through the u.s. refugee program. my question, governor, if isis is trying to infiltrate the refugee population, does the chairman of the homeland security commission said, that raises the political question everyone s been asking this week. what about a ban to make things, all immigration, to make sure we have the system working properly. what are your thoughts? i think we should have a ban on refugees coming here until it s clear there aren t any terrorists embedded. but if a kurd wanted to come to this country, the strongest supporters of the united states in the region that are muslim, i m not sure that s the appropriate thing or an indonesian, blanket coverage of all muslims doesn t make sense, but the key is to have a strategy to destroy isis. we need safe havens inside of
it over to the interns. a straight shooter. yes. and as it was all over the benghazi, it would have been blanket coverage, but the iowans are a particular bunch and the caucusing process is strenuous, and they are engage and informed group of politically-minded people in this country, and on t the republican side, they are looking at a big wide field. they are looking fondly at ben carson and this might be the beginning of a big carson surge to eclipse trump or we don t know, but it is going to be interesting to see trump s re reaction in the days to com and on the tweet, and the said intern tweet, and trump said it was an intern and yanked it, that #ben carson is leading in the polls, and too much monsanto in the brain corn creates issues in the brain? and now, apologizing and of all of the things that we have seen
moment that was really bad. his supporters in overnight polls at least online, say he s the big winner. well, i guess it s the cult of trump that we re watching here. but i think that he suffered from heightened expectations. cnn in particular had blanket coverage of trump leading up to this debate. and i think focused a lot of the questions on trump so that he would be the target of criticism. that was a huge set of expectations that not even the blustery mr. trump could satisfy. compared to those high expectations, he suffers, i think. and that s why i agree with fred, that carly fiorina i think was the winner. she was sharp. she was concise. she obviously thought through her answers and was disciplined about giving those answers in a very organized fashion.
moment that was really bad. his supporters in overnight polls at least online, say he s the big winner. well, i guess it s the cult of trump that we re watching here. but i think that he suffered from heightened expectations. cnn in particular had blanket coverage of trump leading up to this debate. and i think focused a lot of the questions on trump so that he would be the target of criticism. that was a huge set of expectations that not even the blustery mr. trump could satisfy. compared to those high expectations, he suffers, i think. and that s why i agree with fred, that carly fiorina i think was the winner. she was sharp. she was concise. she obviously thought through her answers and was disciplined about giving those answers in a very organized fashion.
the public defenders office there has now brought on an attorney to represent some people who are facing at the portation. it s starting to happen. and i think there s a recogniti recognition. when i talk to mring defenders who represent people on the criminal side, the most frustrating thing in the world is to defend somebody, to get them out of a criminal issue, to get them out of jail, to deal with that issue and then see them slip into the criminal justice system i mean, into the immigration, the civil immigration system and find themselves facing deportation, which is just as great of a consequence if for many people. real quickly, because i know some folks will be saying if they re providing blanket coverage, that has to be expensive. you say in your article fashionly giving a lawyfashion ly nationally giving a lawyer to every indigent would save close to $175 until in detention costs. so this is not necessarily a massively expensive program. potenti potentially a cost saving