would have essentially led to this action. and that is going to be what the plaintiffs may have to very well amend their complaint and move around a little bit to make sure that they could make those allegations fit. the judge has to accept what is in the complaint as true at this point. at this stage. so you can t just make a blanket allegation that somebody did wrong. you have to say, somebody did wrong and tie it to some policy on their part. especially when you re talking about a sovereign municipality or state. this is what they did. so it seems in this motion to dismiss, that they are arguing the inverse of that, that the absence of a policy would not have led to this. let me read from the motion. nichols life was cut short by the actions of these rogue officers in the city in no way condones, radfies or proves that these actions andhey also say no amount of training or policies could have prevented five rogue officers from acting in a manner outside of the scope of their ple
is it legitimate? of course there are some people out there judge him on race. i think karl rove is right when he points out when you make a blanket allegation without examples. it does serve the purpose of legitimizing. there are lots of issues that directly impact race where this white house has come under fire. but i think to lump it all together. as some people are just going to hate me because of my race. i don t think that does any service to the cause that he is talking about. wes, i bring up senator tim scott. i don t remember hearing president obama or attorney general eric holder say anything about them or even condoleezza rice for that matter say anything about issues they said. tim scott was clearly race i do there is a divide where republicans are both treated in the media generally but also treated bipartisan on both sides. do i think that with attorney general s holders
is it legitimate? of course there are some people out there judge him on race. i think karl rove is right when he points out when you make a blanket allegation without examples. it does serve the purpose of legitimizing. there are lots of issues that directly impact race where this white house has come under fire. but i think to lump it all together. as some people are just going to hate me because of my race. i don t think that does any service to the cause that he is talking about. wes, i bring up senator tim scott. i don t remember hearing president obama or attorney general eric holder say anything about them or even condoleezza rice for that matter say anything about issues they said. tim scott was clearly race i do there is a divide where republicans are both treated in the media generally but also treated bipartisan on both sides. do i think that with attorney general s holders