don t actually care about accuracy. they just want to hear a certain thing said. they don t care if it s right or wrong. they just want to hear it. it s like if you had a weatherman who got the wrong report day after day, or a stockbroker were every time he told you to invest, the place went down to the street. these people would have no jobs. everybody in the media continues to cast paychecks and it s just embarrassing every single day. i m going to continue to point it out. dana: juan, let me ask you. president obama had warned that the democrats, you re moving too far left, people do not want that radical change. slow your roll. will the democratic party take a role from this? juan: i do not think that s what it s about. clearly it was a landside for boris johnson. i think the opposition here was jeremy corbyn. dana: a choice between two people. juan: in this case, jeremy corbin is not charismatic even if you were to say, is he
that on these media companies don t actually care about accuracy. they just want to hear a certain thing said. they don t care if it s right or wrong. they just want to hear it. it s like if you had a weatherman who got the wrong report day after day, or a stockbroker were every time he told you to invest, the place went down to the street. these people would have no jobs. everybody in the media continues to cast paychecks and it s just embarrassing every single day. i m going to continue to point it out. dana: juan, let me ask you. president obama had warned that the democrats, you re moving too far left, people do not want that radical change. slow your roll. will the democratic party take a role from this? juan: i do not think that s what it s about. clearly it was a landside for boris johnson. i think the opposition here was jeremy corbyn. dana: a choice between two people. juan: in this case, jeremy corbin is not charismatic even if you were to say, is he
rhetoric, a master of hosting. largely static. before, you are right. greg: he s going to win in a landside if you keep saying this, juan. dana: changing the minds of democrats and congressional districts that trump won. democrats are not worried about hurting for impeachment. i also saw today that there may be democrat senators who are thinking about voting against impeachment. katie: there will be. dana: this is a lose-lose for democrats. katie: schumer s job is try to win back the majority. house impeachment going to go over there? juan: i heard from charles schumer today on it. mr. schumer said that this is a strong case for conviction and, i note, that democrats, the democratic base, as we ve heard just now and you saw the poll that the master host put up,
as we tend to expect, not to convict the president, not to remove him, by november? how much of an impact does that have on suburban swing voter, on the president s space, zblets we don t know what the sped up newspaper has done. there are so many controversies. you can t remember which one is which. ruth, two theories of the case, if he loses in a land side, we are all going to rewrite history and say the impeachment had a huge impact, the voters made a decision a long time, they were waiting. totally. totally obvious. or not. you know what i mean? but that very well may be the case. so i think your point about the speeded up news cycle is a really critical point. i was doing a show on the friday after baghdadi was killed on sunday. when did that happen, right? a different week? it was too late. that felt so old. it was a huge event. so old, five days later.
room. in your deposition, you testified that call was not what you were hoping to hear. what did you fwhin? i was hoping for a more full throated statement of support from the president concerning president zelenskyy s reform agenda given where we were at the time with respect to the overwhelming mandate president zelenskyy servant of the party people had received in the election. and that election, the ukrainian parliament that, election occurred four days earlier? that s right. and president zelenskyy s party fwhon a land side, is that right? they received more than a majority in their own right. at least in ukraine there was tremendous support for zelenskyy s anti-corruption agenda, is that right? at the time. and within the interagency, within the national security agencies here in the united states, was there broad support for president zelenskyy?