also to look into issues of privacy, data sharing and so forth. it privacy, data sharing and so forth. , . privacy, data sharing and so forth. ., . forth. it is a tricky balancing act because forth. it is a tricky balancing act because you forth. it is a tricky balancing act because you don t - forth. it is a tricky balancing act because you don t want | forth. it is a tricky balancing i act because you don t want to stifle innovation but at the same time, you want to regulate the industry. how do you think governments can address issues like misinformation and also making sure that our children will actually have jobs in say? this is a balancing act and both of them we are doing in europe, we are looking at how can this help innovation, how can this help innovation, how can also new forms of ai help for instance in healthcare, help to make some jobs easier. we also look at this part of, how can we defend the rights that we find so important, privacy, nondiscrimination, transparenc
looking for white supremacy activities. we couldn t go on the websites because of the fear in the justice department that we would be abusing the privacy rights. well, hold on. if they are public websites, why is it privacy if you go on what everyone else can see? it s like you were in the room when i argued that point. but you ask any ajegent there a the time, and we will say, listen, if someone takes that garbage out to the curb, it s considered abandoned and we can take it. but if they put it on a website, we are not allowed to go on the website to see what they re doing, and the point is, the fbi does not go on to see what people are doing, and that is that was the mentality at the time. and i hope it s changed. but still, we don t have you know, you have your the two police callouts.
liberty. would you specifically tell me specifically state what the right is? is it specifically abortion? is it liberty? is it autonomy? is it privacy. the right is grounded in the 14th amendment, but i think there s an interest in autonomy, liberty, and equality. i think it is the right to abortion, the right of a woman to be able to control without the state forcing to carry that baby to term. i understand you re talking about abortion here, but what is confusing is that we if we were talking about the second amendment, the 4th amendment, i know what we re talking about. because it s written.
make a family decisions and the right to physical autonomy including the right to end a pre-viability pregnancy. so it s all of the above. that s how the court interpreted the liberty clause for over 100 years in cases going back to meyer, griswald, carey, loving, lawrence. all of those come out of lochner so we ve dropped part of it. so i understand what you have are saying but what i m trying to focus on is if we is to lower the level of generality or be a little more specific. in the old days we used to say it was a right to privacy the court found in the due process, substantive due process clause, okay, or in substantive due process. what are we relying on now? is it privacy? is it autonomy? what is it? it continues to be liberty and the right exists whatever