involving carter page, involving george papadopoulos.s. that, to me, was a scheme from the start. the dossier, you have comey, you have mccabe, you have strzok, you have all of them and brennan, this was a collusion effort and it will turn out as you mentioned before, the fisa documents thatu never should have been granted by the court, totally phony application, and done time after time. getting into a lot of the details, the fact there was never a basis for the t investigation to start in the first place. sean: good to see you both. when we come back, congresswoman ocasio-cortez, speaker pelosi publicly feuding. a hannity mini-monologue and dan bongino next. hb 25 many monologue and dan bongino next. and dan bongino next. my experience with usaa
strzok and page and all these strzok and page and all these people and concluded their people and concluded their political opinions did not political opinions did not interfere with their decisions interfere with their decisions in the probe and there was in the probe and there was nothing wrong with being in the nothing wr probe. the attorney general, the prior the attorney general, the prior attorney general asked the u.s. attorney general asked the u.s. attorney in utah, herd i think attorney in utah, herd i think his name is. his name is. something like that. something like that. huber. huber. huber, to do a second huber, t investigation. we re waiting for the result of we re wai that. we don t need a third we don t need a third investigation of the same investigation of the same material just designed to material just designed to further the propaganda against further the propaganda against the mueller investigation and the mueller investigation and against an apolitical
mercers, in partnership with steve bannon, like, that was one of the reasons the hillary clinton investigation was launched. people in the fbi saw this book, saw all of these allegations and said, we need to look into it. so it s not that unusual at least in terms of recent memory investigations of recent figu figures. yeah, i don t know how unusual it is historically. i supported the idea that we needed a mueller investigation to find out what russia did. and i support the idea that we need a barr, fbi, ig, whatever you want to call it investigation to find out all this other stuff too. they are not the same thing, but they are equally important. i think if everything was done correctly and we find that out, we will rejoice for knowing that our law enforcement community and this organization and the intelligence community acted appropriately. and if there need to be policy changes, we ll have that ptoo. i don t know why anyone would be worried about that. i ve always been skeptica
i want to read a tweet from charlie kirk. he lists the names and asks the question. lisa page, hillary clinton, james comey mueller lynch, barack obama, john brennan. now that mueller finishes investigation it is time to investigate these people who entangled america in a two year national nightmare to destroy donald trump. any chance any of that happens? beyond the it investigation which is ongoing we had one i g investigation into how hillary clinton was investigated and another one going into this probe, no. none of that is going to happen. that is your fantasy. this was a campaign that made clear its willingness to conspire with foreign actors. you had donald trump junior meeting someone he thought was a russian government proxy to get documents directly to the russian government, paul manafort, the chairman, in august 2017 handing 75 pages of detailed polling data to a russian intelligence operative and roger stone telling everyone he knew what was coming from wikileaks. if ever
investigating the trump family business. they ve started hiring staff with deep experience tracing cash flowing through this complicated transactions. trump previously said that robert mueller, the special counsel, investigating or looking at his family business would be crossing a red line. and democrats by soon starting it investigation are sort of marching straight over that red line that president trump said himself would be out of everyone s purview to look into. let me talk about something that the president brought up on late-term abortions. i know we should expect to hear from him on this issue possibly as early as today. reporter: that s right. my colleague was in a meeting with the white house official in which it was said that the president is going to reaffirm the anti-abortion rhetoric at