war iii, people are certainly upping the stakes in the hyperbolic language. t5 the stakes in the hyperbolic language- the stakes in the hyperbolic lanauaae. , i, the stakes in the hyperbolic lanauaae. . i, , the stakes in the hyperbolic lanauaae. . , ., language. is it hyperbole? it is not world war iii language. is it hyperbole? it is not world war m the language. is it hyperbole? it is not world war iii the next language. is it hyperbole? it is not world war iii the next day, - language. is it hyperbole? it is not world war iii the next day, no, - language. is it hyperbole? it is not| world war iii the next day, no, but it is a slippery slope which can happen quickly and it would send a unmistakable signal to the chinese that taiwan is now fair game and they will get a tepid response from they will get a tepid response from the west. so, no, it is not world war three the next day but it could be inside the e and i do not think thatis be inside the e and i do not think that i
the phone call, there is a record of that. you know, you can debate whether that is criminal or not, but his response was not on the specifics of the case. he still thinks he won the election, and so he did nothing wrong. you thinks he won the election, and so he did nothing wrong. thinks he won the election, and so he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weiaht he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weight of he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weight of the he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weight of the case. he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weight of the case. of he did nothing wrong. you talk about the weight of the case. of course, i the weight of the case. of course, we have this phone call, this infamous phone call. just talk me through how damning that is. well. through how damning that is. well, when ou through how damning that is. well, when you can through how damning that is. well, when you can he through how damning that is. well, when y
this infamous phone call. talk me through how damning that - this infamous phone call. talk me through how damning that is. - this infamous phone call. talk me i through how damning that is. when ou can through how damning that is. when you can see through how damning that is. when you can see something through how damning that is. when you can see something or through how damning that is. “to“iezfl you can see something or hear something with your own ears and eyes, that makes it different from an all weather, you believe this witness, are they biased? you don t need a witness for that phone call and you have to evaluate whether it is a crime to find these votes or is it hyperbole. i am sure donald trump was riffing on that call and was not told by his advisers to make that specific phone call and rip ask for the votes. he was freelancing as if to say, who is a businessman in new york and who can fix this and he did not expect him to be recording this and to be someone who i
king, you best not miss. the bottom line is this would be a riskyxdçó prosecution for the manhattan d.a. with several opportunities to missçó includi by getting the case thrown out by a judge or goingjf to trial d losing. so prosecutors want to make sure they have as compellinge/qxdçóñ1 q as possible, and that s probably what they re working on. so brendan, you know, we ve been waitingt( fori]fá this, ane been talking about the importance of this.lpçó is it hyperbole to say that the stakes are high? they re high for donald trump who s running for president in 2024. they re high for his party as we mentioned. they re the folks who have largely tied their fortunes to his and, frankly, for history. yeah, it s remarkable.çó on one hand it feels likei] thi historic event, obviously something we have never seen. ite1 also in some ways feels a little familiar, right? donald trumpok inviting chaos, having all ofe1 us think maybe
have to look for what may possibly help. one thing that may help is these open primaries, where it will not have the trumpiest 5%, or 10% of the party determining who the nominees are. mona, if the republicans take the house in november, kevin mccarthy becomes speaker. and the big lie candidates like finch will take the secretary offices in key swing states states. is it hyperbole, exaggeration to say that the 2022 could end up being the last fully free and fair election for the u.s.? given that they will not allow democrats to win in 2024, they will not allow a free and fair election in 2024, are they? i think that is overstated. i think it has to be on our minds, and we have to be vigilant. obviously, these are just primaries, these are not general elections. a number of these extreme candidates will be defeated. but we saw in kansas suggests that the abortion matter is