massive majority actually is not great for democracy, massive majority actually is not great for democracy, which - massive majority actually is not great for democracy, which is l massive majority actually is notl great for democracy, which is an even great for democracy, which is an even stronger great for democracy, which is an even stronger argument- great for democracy, which is an even stronger argument for- great for democracy, which is an . even stronger argument for having some even stronger argument for having some greens even stronger argument for having some greens who even stronger argument for having some greens who will even stronger argument for having some greens who will hold - even stronger argument for having some greens who will hold them l even stronger argument for having | some greens who will hold them to account, some greens who will hold them to account, to some greens who will hold them to account, to ask some greens who will hold t
also on the issue of education for example on a reform of the intelligence services so many topics they could address together where they are at least quite a bit on the same page and where they could push forward and make me a bit braver in the four years to come. well that all makes sense on paper but i think i think the problem is that these parties are just too different from one another at the end of the day and especially the people who vote for them the typical green voter is not going to really be happy when he or she reads the free democrat party program or when they hear what the f.t.p. leader christian linton wants to do with asylum seekers for example or the way they approach europe and the euro zone so i think you know this is an idea that sort of sounds good but when you really look at it closely it would be very difficult to make work i don t think that angela merkel once of either people forget the last time that she had a coalition with just the free democrats in two t