a big deal. cocaine. now, the cocainee. e coca, as they say, could have been worse. they could have gotten to the the bi the bio weapons. they could have gone to a lotis of other things. but go pick cocaine is pretty bad if somebody is takingki cocaine and making decisions. what if there was that nolann ? what if it was anthrax? well, it could have been a lotr? of god forbid, it could have been a lot mr. things.. and they have cameras. and i would imagine its. doesn here. but secret service is so incredible, they don t get enoughcret serdible. enoughe they re under the orders of other people. but i think secret servicell you would be able to tell you the real answer. bu t yout you can t have a thinr that. the most embarrassing thing for our country. werassing fo were respected thrs ago. this country was respectedspect. and putin knew he couldn t do it. and president xi of china knew he couldn tit and. do it. you know, i gave iowa and farm farmers the farm farm states $28 b
un security council is saying we need un security council is saying we need to un security council is saying we need to work internationally to understand the risk, mitigate those risks and understand the risk, mitigate those risks and also put structures and regulations in place. that can only be done regulations in place. that can only be done internationally, that s what we discussed today. give be done internationally, that s what we discussed today. we discussed today. give me an examle we discussed today. give me an example of we discussed today. give me an example of what we discussed today. give me an example of what is we discussed today. give me an example of what is maligned. . we discussed today. give me an l example of what is maligned. the we discussed today. give me an - example of what is maligned. the use of ai example of what is maligned. the use of al to develon example of what is maligned. the use of al to develop weapons. example of what is maligne
and this is what he told me toda . ., today. at that point we will fill still today. at that point we will fill still largely - today. at that point we will fill still largely under. today. at that point we will| fill still largely under the fill still largely under the influence fill still largely under the influence when a particular sentence was written that that might sentence was written that that might have been a bio engineered virus, may be a weapon engineered virus, may be a weapon that accidentally got released. ., weapon that accidentally got released. . , . , released. but that sentence is not about released. but that sentence is not about bio released. but that sentence is not about bio weapons, - released. but that sentence is not about bio weapons, it - released. but that sentence is| not about bio weapons, it says any laboratory based scenario. yes, it was, so maybe we went a little yes, it was, so maybe we went a little bit yes, it wa
sentence in the paper. we do not believe any land based scenario is plausible , they had written, and this is what he told me today. at that point we were still largely under the influence, when that particular sentence was written, that this might have been a bio engineered virus, maybe a weapon that accidentally got released. but that sentence is not about bio weapons, it says any laboratory based scenario. yes, it was, so maybe we went a little bit too far there, but, you know. so for a scientific paper that was as influential as that one, the idea of hearing somebody as eminent as bob garry suggesting that they may have pushed that conclusion a little too far is, as you might expect, getting a fair bit of reaction on places like twitter this evening. it does seem pretty surprising. how significant is this? well, we ought to say and make it very clear that prof garry told me that much of the evidence that has
them in to bye-bye bio weapons. one of the women i spoke to, a physician, raised her hand and said what are we doing here? she was told she would be disappeared if she raised questions. she fled since hen. that is what we re dealing with now. this is probably something that came from the lab. there was good evidence. we have to keep asking questions and now we have some patient zeros where it looks like it came from. we ll no more next week. martha: stunning. dr. drew pinsky, i urge everybody to watch his interview on his website. thanks, doctor. good to see you. thanks, martha. martha: coming up, dave rubin as the white house snaps back at these questions. does the white house worry about the physical safety of females competing against males in sports? what did the president say to parents out there that have