why paint the fbi as a nefarious organization? chris, chris, chris, quit putting words in my mouth. the president and this administration loves the thousands of rank and file fbi agents throughout the country. they do a tremendous job and they are the backbone of the greatest law enforcement agency this world has ever seen. what we are talking about is a few bad apples of the senior levels of the fbi that have allowed politics to take place to influence decisions that should be exclusively about justice you have proof of that? excuse me? you have proof of that other than this comey thing which is not substantial? i have the fact that the lead agent in this russia investigation was removed from the case specifically for political bias. peter strzok. he was removed because he was practicing communications on government equipment that he shouldn t and he was showing political bias which is something you refuse to admit. show the viewers exactly those
are that. there are allegations made and the department of justice inspector general investigated those matters. gates, dowdy, senator johnson. why wouldn t you call those guys out? they re raising very legitimate questions, chris. they said there was a secret agency on the basis of one text that they didn t understand the context of. they re saying that the missing because everything around it was deleted, chris. you then got the text. they never corrected the assertion. you don t think that s unfair, raj? i think ron johnson has spoken to it. i m going to let members of congress speak to their own words and defend their own actions. what we are saying is we want a department of justice and we want an fbi that s above political bias. of course. we believe that the thousands of fbi agents who risked their lives and worked tirelessly for the greatest law enforcement agency in the history of this world do you trust the fbi?
about immigration but i need you on the record about this congressman, do you think this is a law you would back because it is necessary? what i would say to you, chris, is the entire process is still unfolding unfortunately in front of us rather than where it needs to take place as a full investigation. what happened originally was the president saw the team that mr. mueller assembled and that team did not appear to be completely fair. there appeared to be some bias with them. now, what should we do with the bill? i have no reason to believe that we need to pass any bill that tells the president how he should or should not conduct himself as it relates to mr. mueller. i think that you have already heard that the president has appropriately listened to counsel, appropriately allowing this to take place and move forward and i believe it s in the best interest of americans
taint, above questions, above political malfees answer. don t you want the proof of these types of suggestions before you qualify your belief in the fbi? when the lead investigator of this highly politically charged investigation is removed for billy bias that is a strong piece of evidence to suggest there s a lot going on there that raises questions. it s being investigated by the department of justice inspector general. we support that investigation and want to see what it finds. you think bob mueller can be trusted? sure. the president spoke to this in an interview the the new york times, bob mueller is a role we respect the process. we ve been fully cooperative. remember, the last president to be hit with a special counsel subpoena was bill clinton and not this president. there has been no subpoena, is that your way of saying that he will if asked to meet with the special counsel he will say yes? the president spoken to that. i know he and his attorneys are working on