for being the head of bain capitol. in the middle of the debate i m not going to apologize. i have earned everything i have got. i didn t inherit it. i earned it jacksonville arena, no matter how were for, exploded. bill: why didn t romney and why don t more people show this righteous anger? why don t they? well, taps little dangerous in politics and people sometimes are risk adverse. you know, look. bill: why is it dangerous because they are going to be demonized by the media? sometimes the anger is not seen as appropriate and sometimes it leads you places. remember, ed mcmuskie 1960. bill: cried and he was out. started with righteous anger. he felt the local newspaper. the manchester union leader was sliming his wife. but it turned into something. bill: but he didn t see, the anger that he showed was not all right i m going to defend my wife. it was more kind of a pitiful thing it? started with a strong defense and ended up with a pitiful thing. sometimes when you
continuing basis of karzai saying this sort of thing, then, you know, there is not going to be any way for this enterprise to work out very well anyway. bill: i don t think we have won the hearts and minds of most people in afghanistan. i think they are fanatical. they are illiterate as i said. they are living in a stone age environment. and that s the way they are going to stay. it s hard to drag people out of there but there are a lot of people in afghanistan who do not favor the return to power of the taliban who treated them horribly. and with them of course comes the, you know, the feared al qaeda sanctuaries which are a problem for us and would be a very serious problem for the afghan people as well. so, you know, this isn t headed in the direction that the afghan people are going to like any better than what the united states has been trying to help them create. bill: people are so scared because the taliban will kill them and, you know, they don t trust that karzai is going
is disrespectful. it is that he adistributes to his opponents motives saying they can t disagree with him without having ill motives. they either want to protect tax break for multigazillionaire. same time he is doing that organizing for america is sending out email blasts at the time that the president is meeting with republicans in congress. and this one they say that 70,000 kids will be tossed out of head start because of the republicans. senior nutrition programs will be slashed. 10,000 teachers lose their lives. 25,000 fewer breast and cervical screenings because of the republicans. bill: that s the president s fundraising arm. remember, this in 2010, he called soft money groups like the one that i m associated with, american crossroads, quote: threats to democracy. this wednesday, he will appear at an event benefiting soft money
katharine. when is the last time you had some of that. i think i went off on juan two weeks ago on another show. [ laughter ] we had that moment. look, i think it s healthy every now and then. and i think it s hilarious ly hypocritical. it is their stock and trade on every issue from chick-fil-a to 20-ounce cokes. bill: they do it in passive aggressive way. smear, innuendo and you will see that with the denver post coming up with bernie goldberg later in the program. the idea of getting so bent out of shape out of this. chill out, winey babies. sometimes we have fights and we apologize after we are done. they couldn t care less. they want to diminish the network. the network clocks them every day. now, juan you are kind of a savvy guy. not a real savvy guy but kind of a savvy guy. you are so kind. don t you understand that when i engage in this kind of hyperbole with
caused all kinds of problems by talking about it on the factor. so beck and i see the danger here but this two parts to my question. number one, it s hard to convince people who don t pay attention that there is a danger because you can t really see it it s not like there is a mountain lion on your front yard. theoretical well we are going to go bankrupt and people are going well, i can t see it how do we sell this? hang on just a second. i just want to make sure i m right. that bill o reilly is asking me how you tell people of a danger something that s in the future that you can t really prove? i mean, this is ironic. bill. it really is. bill: no. you can prove it. it s not like you saying that the communists are going to take over the country and all of that. they are. bill: $17 trillion debt, which is going to be 20 when barack obama gets out of office. that s how you can prove it. here s the thing.