i just turn off the tv. i can t watch it anymore. you can t do that you have to look at the truth. but you have to get right down to the truth and not be a weasel and say well, it s my truth or my party s truth. the other side is, there is all kinds of different cowards. and one of them is like barack obama. he ll speak the language to just about everybody and he will say the right key words to each particular group. so he can get elected because he knows he can t do what newsweek did a few years ago and say we re all socialists now. we are all for big government. we re all going down that road. whenever he does that, he immediately retracts. that s a sign of a coward. bill: all right. he did it just last week when he said you know what, look, you know, the private sector is doing fine. no, it s not. but he believes that but he won t say that. bill: paging through your book. the book is all about the facts. the people in the news media, the politicians and the revolutionaries
molesting boys. here now kimberly guilfoyle and lis wiehl. i m not convicting this guy on tv but just the testimony rolling. in no way sandusky is going to see the light of day he is done. we would agree with you. two accusers taking the stabbed they tell in great detail which we are not going to go into here that he was grooming them. piece by piece by piece. remember, these accusers did not know each other before this trial. bill: yeah. it would be impossible to impeach 10 people. exactly. bill: there might be some that jump on the bandwagon and that s what michael jackson s lawyer did in california. this is a totally different situation. but what sandusky s attorney is going to try to do is impeach the credibility of the witnesses you are doing this because you want to sue civilly, sue the university get a paycheck, right? absolutely. if they were able to secure this criminal judgment and then a civil lawsuit being successful is a slam dunk, basically. think about the cred
bill: they were down there for months protesting. they are saying that the police did what. entrapped them. bill: by doing what? making march. follow this to this blind. this is where we want you to go. follow us there. and then arrest them. bill: lured them to the brooklyn bridge and then when they got out there t was like moses and the egyptians luring the egyptians into the red sea and then, boom! exactly. bill: the egyptians could have sued but they are all dead. yeah. where was the aclu then, right? bill: that s right. do you know where they were? no, i m not even going to go there. don t go there. happy days one of my favorite shows you like happy days, right? you were 5 and 6 years old at the time? happy days? all right, now erin moran played joany and had her own show spin off. joan loves khachi. joan got evicted from her california apartment because she is broke and in bad
millionaire s tax cut by kicking children off the head start programs or asking students to pay more for college or eliminating health insurance for millions of poor and elderly and disabled americans on medicaid. bill: we are not sure who is paying up the back-up singers but they do sound very good. glenn beck joins from us dallas. i have never heard anything like that. bill: this a campaign ad i haven t either. i would love to hear mitt romney s backup singers. probably sound like the osmonds. here is the problem with that ad. it s two fold. they talk about we have got your back, mr. president. isn t the president supposed to have our back? isn t he the guy who is supposed to be the guy who ensures that he is watching our liberty and our life so nobody comes and kills our family or kills us and nobody can scoop us up off the streets in the middle of the night. which is he not really doing either of those things.
o neal really could not stand in the way of that reagan was able to mobilize public opinion. the fact that he got along well with tipp o neal simply speaks to political skills which every idealogue, every politician, every president ought to have. and he worked very well with the democrats. but the democrats were in a losing position because reagan had the ideas and he had the people behind him. that is very different. it was different in the bush years and that s why there was more compromise. reagan often would give away some of the details and some of the policies but on principles, shrinking government, stronger national defense, cutting taxes. he was utterly uncompromising and he got his way. that s exactly what republicans ought to be doing. and if they win the presidency in 2012, that s what they should do. bill: now, did the republic party reject the real strong conservative doctrineaire point of view by choosing mitt romney over, say, rick