to be easy to proof. it would be a misdemeanor. that would not be within the statute of limitation. we don t know what the felonies of the statute of limitations the misdemeanor would be by years. in order to make this a case that can survive a test of those statute of limitations they had to bring this as a felony. and so, the way they ramp up a misdemeanor falsifying business records charge to a felony 1 is to say that it was with intent to defraud or intent to commit another crime made and conceal the commission of another crime. bret: right. which is the new york law. are they doing. don t know what the crime was. bret: are they doing it to the federal election law? are they doing it to some other state new york law? what are they doing? i mean, if you read this indictment, they could be doing it to a drunk driving case. honestly, that s how ve vague tt thing is. let s assume that it is to the federal election law, which it s going to be, i m sure. when we get the bill of p
news. i grew up with it. almost 28 years, and i love it. but every channel throughout the past 14 hours has been on the trump story. there is a lot of important matters happening in the world. jesse: right, it was a bush league indictment if you read it and everybody expected more, and we do expect to hear more from the president tonight at eight: 15 from mar-a-lago. bill hemmer? bill: we will see that tonight at 8:15. alvin bragg, the d.a. here in manhattan, jesse, defending this historic decision, to charge former president trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records. i have been doing this for 24 years. i don t bring cases prior to an investigation, now having done so, the case has been brought. why now? as i just mentioned, we had available to the office
insufficient on its face, it is duplicitous, and what that means is they ve got if you look at the first four counts, they all occurred on february 14th of 2017. that means you ve got the same course of conduct, they are just looking at it differently, okay, so nobody get excited about the 34 counts, they are meaningless. and there will also be a bill of particulars beer in the bill of particulars, which is required to be submitted in new york state in 15 days, and may be extended to 35 if the judge wants to give the d.a. a break, they ve got to be real clear on what the bill of particulars says because a defendant has a right to prepare for trial. and this is garbage. you don t have a right to prepare you don t know what to prepare for on this. and by the way, you know, the whole concept that bragg gets up and he talks about, you know, this is new york, we are the center of the financial world, and all of that hogwash, doesn t
is. i think d.a.s i don t think we should elect judges either because by definition, you know what that means? means those offices are politicized. finally, i hope tonight, harris, you raise the sound and point to make a president trump, i hope he focuses he entered his plea of not guilty, until evidee and facts proven in a courtroom at a jury believes othe otherwise. why i want to run for president, the issues, bill, what happened in china, including inflation. that is why people, i think, are going to elect him or not elect him, as the republican nominee. and eventually come if he is the nominee. bill: harris, your name was invoked. harris: it certainly was. a couple of things come in reverse order. i don t think you need to worry about what trump will focus. he went to east palestine, ohio,
president donald j. trump. so-called progressive prosecutors have brought chaos to local jurisdictions. across our nation. but now bragg has proven that sorrow site and back prosecutors can attempt to destroy the nation as a whole. this is embarrassing, bare-bones, a stain of our nation which will only be washed away by returning president donald j. trump to the white house. where he belongs. and then it is a little bit on background. the one thing about truth social, there is enough room, you could write something longer maybe than this indictment. harold: you have an opinion on this pecker thing? bill: i m used to asking questions, not answering them. listening to the lawyers talk, i think bragg said legally he doesn t have to bring the other case now, he does not have to show jeanine: he doesn t bill: would suggest he doesn t have to show his hand. we have said repeatedly there is nothing new that has appeared in seven years. they requested to move it to