The whistleblower made falseht statements, the whistleblower got caught with chairman schiff. Remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the House Judicial Committee which has spent a full week on this, thats not who has been in charge. They put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistleblower. Have you spoken directly with the whistleblower . No, we have not. Wed like to. That wasnt true. The person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didnt have it. The person who in the course of that read into the record the steele dossier because the people needed to know what happened about the truth of what happened. We heard about the truth of what happened with the steele dossier this week when the Inspector General said it was all garbage, rubbish, all made up. Yeah, thatad chairman schiff. And now he got caught not being truthful about a whistleblower who, as i told you t
he still agreed to meet with them. article 2 section four of the united states constitution says the president and vice president shall been he moved for convictn ofd treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors. we don t have that here. one that is outlined in a criminal statute. for example, nixon was accused of a criminal act, bill clinton three. these were crimes that not tried in the house of representatives could have been tried in a criminal court. this standard of criminality, as mr. turley explained, although criminality is not required, clarity is nnecessary. that comes from a complete and comprehensive record that eliminates exculpatory motivations or explanations. the democrats couldn t find any criminal act on the part of the president. instead of relying on historical precedent of criminality they decided to impeach him for abuse of power, a vague phrase that appears nowhere in the constitution when discussing