Dnc. That seems like corruption. I dont know how else he would describe that. No, its not. Heres what actually happened, and im sure it happened on the republican side as well, which is that when someone has secured their partys nomination, essentially they start acting as one with the Party Committee. So it seems as though the Clinton Campaign decided to make this agreement early which said, hey, guys, when i actually secure the nomination, you know that we are going to have to go over some things like that. That, to me, does not seem out of the ordinary. Tucker thats not actually what it said. Look, if youre making the point that both parties tried to rigged the system in favor of the candidate they want, youre absolutely right, and the republicans tried to do that and they failed, and that is how they got trumped. No, its true. Both parties tried to rig it, but my question is, dont voters have a say in this . It doesnt belong to the party who is paid by it but by the voters that vot
the bill yet, even though it had been available for a week, but they seemed confused about how the commission would be structured, how it would work. they raised concerns that were largely addressed in the legislation. so that s where we are. it seems very difficult for them to reach the ten votes needed for democrats to pass this bill in the senate at this point. it seems to me that sounds a lot like when they used to say, i didn t see the tweet. to your point, a lot of the things in this bill address their concerns. so what is their real objection, having maybe at this point read the bill, right here on friday night? right. so senator rubio i spoke to on thursday, he was speaking to reporters, raising concerns. the commission he was worried it would issue political subpoenas, that it would turn into sort of a partisan circus. and i pointed out, it s evenly divided. the democrats on that commission would not be able to issue
congressman, thanks for coming on. good to be with you, tucker. thanks for having me. tucker: if the message of the last election was, the middle class feels neglected, and an awful lot of americans make less than their parents made, and if that is the core problem in american politics, and i think it probably is, how does this bill address that problem postmarked two things. one, as he mentioned in your intro, we let more middle income americans keep more of their income, which is a great thing. we simplify the code so people don t have to go to their accountant and to itemize deductions. i think the biggest thing is, we are a global economy. we have businesses because the tax rates are too high, they go to some foreign country provided tax rates. if we bring our corporate tax rates from 35% down to 20%, we are going to see american businesses actually come back home and bring their money back home and invest here in america. and when you have more investment, more business, tha
joins us. congressman, thanks for coming on.on good to be with you, tucker. thanks for having me. tucker: if the message of the last election was, the middle class feels neglected, and an awful lot of americans make less than their parents made, and if that is the core problem inin american politics, and i think it probably is, how does this bill address that problem?ee two things. one, as you mentioned in your intro, we let more middle-income americans keep more of their income, which is a great thing. we simplify the code so people don t have to go to their accountant and itemize deductions. i think the biggest thing is, we are a global economy. w we lose businesses because the tax rates are too high, they go to some foreign country for better tax rates. if we bring our corporate tax rates from 35% down to 20%, we are going to see american businesses actually come back home and bring their money back home and invest here in america. and when you have more investment, more busin
of people so premiums would go down, your out of pocket cost would likely increase. how does this bill address that in the senate? my announcement of out of pocket cut would increase out of the senate bill as well. that s my major concern. under the house bill as you know for that vulnerable group between the age of 50 and 64, living in northern maine and with an income of only $26,400. there would be as much as an 800% increase in premiums as well as higher deductibles and copays. we cannot have that happen, we are still waiting for the analysis from cbo to see what the impact will be. do keep in mind that the senate