spanish is no longer the dominant language. tucker: you were waiting into the deep end hey, hold on. since you are throwing facts around, and the deep end of the fact pool, what percentage of households in california speak spanish at home? offhand, no, i don t. tucker: stop. slow down. over 40. that s not assimilation. i m not against speaking spanish, not against bilingualism. what i m saying is the opposite of the way we have always done immigration in the past in whict we say two new immigrants, you must adopt our culture and language, and you have to do it thoroughly. we are not doing that now, it s not assimilation. you did not address what he said about education levels because it s demonstrably true. people under the southern border have lower education. why in this economy when blue-collar jobs are going away, why would we only admit software engineers are people who have skills we need now? what are we doing? you and i have different ideas.
then the spanish is no longer the dominant language. tucker: you are wading in the deepened. and since you are throwing facts around and in the deepened. what percentage much the households speak spanish at home? do you know? offhand i don t. tucker: let me tell you over 40. and that is not assim always. i am not against speaking spanish or bilingualism. but the opposite of the way of immigration in the pass and we say you must adopt our culture and language. we are not doing that now. and so it is not assim ulgsz. education levels is true. why in a post industrial economy when blue collar jobs are going away. why don tee only admit software engineers and people with skills now. you and i have different view
then the spanish is no longer the dominant language. tucker: you are wading in the deepened. and since you are throwing facts around and in the deepened. what percentage much the households speak spanish at home? do you know? offhand i don t. tucker: let me tell you over 40. and that is not assim always. i am not against speaking spanish or bilingualism. but the opposite of the way of immigration in the pass and we say you must adopt our culture and language. we are not doing that now. and so it is not assim ulgsz. education levels is true. why in a post industrial economy when blue collar jobs are going away. why don tee only admit software engineers and people with skills now. you and i have different view
system. if we get the americans into the work force, we will still need people in this country. canada, australia, and germany and the united kingdom have immigration policies with some or all of these requirements. an ability to speak the language and education and the ability to support one s family. the united states doesn t have those standards. today you can get a green card in this country simply because someone in your extended family happened to immigrate to this country. there are expensive consequences. the hiring of teachers and the bilingualism that is required is a burden. democrats are opposed to ending chain migration. this week it emerged he wanted to change immigration policy with other addressing
is also a spanish-speaking country it s asserted largest spanish-speaking country in the world. the united states itself doesn t have an official language. i don t oppose come as a matter of fact our public policy is bilingualism, we want to teach and further our kids and citizens to have both languages and be robust. tucker: its work so well in canada and belgium we want to try it here, why would we want to try to be a bilingual country question works because you don t have to be it s a multilingual country. what i m saying is in terms of the official stance, many other states in the united states don t have an official language as you know. the united states as a whole doesn t have it. of course we worked under the federal government, we already do. the federal courts in puerto rico, different federal structures already there, pushing through in english. is not something that would be