Histori historians talk about artifacts featured in their joint publication, the civil war in 50 objects. In this program they discuss items related to the end of the war and president Abraham Lincolns assassination. This conversation took place online, and the New York Historical society provided the video. Good evening and welcome to the eighth and final episode of the history hour. Tonights topic is saving the union and ending the civil war at the battlefield and the ballot box. As always i want to remind you that tonights program which is being recorded will last approximately 45 minutes. This includes 15 minutes for questions and answers. Please submit your questions via the q a function on your zoom screen at any time during the talk. We will respond to as many as possible during the final part of the program. And now, saving the union and ending the civil war. So our series has argued that an aggregate objects and documents have the singular power to convey a narrative in your c
That tonights program, which is being recorded, will last approximately 45 minutes. This includes 15 minutes for questions and answers. Please submit your questions via the q a function on your zoom screen at any time during the talk. We will respond to as many as possible during the final part of the program. And now, saving the union and ending the civil war. So our series has argued that in aggregate, objects and documents have the singular power to convey a sweeping historical narrative, in our case, the story of the civil war. So harold, now looking back on the book, which inspired the series, the civil war and 50 objects, are there any objects or documents among the plethora of choices we had in new york historics collection that you wish we had been able to include . Oh, from the book . I would say we covered the waterfront pretty well in terms of diversifying the choices. I guess a couple of regrets for time reasons was the handwritten diary of George Templeton strong, perhaps,
A powerful adam of which was a prominent advocate for liberal causes and a strong supporter of pro european sentiments and prior to his killing he come under massive pressure from a right Wing Hate Campaign so after his death his widow magdalena has taken up the fight against the hate speech that she says is having such a devastating impact in poland poisoning politics and threatening lifes. For a year magdalena has been visiting her husbands grave at St Marys Church in dansk. She says he stood for freedom and against polands right wing populist law and Justice Party that tramples on that freedom and that this cost him his life. He was killed by hate speech was averted by these troll factories. Were just information spread about pavel. The accusations in the defamation. Thats what killed him. In the 1980 s. Pavel adam ovitz was a student leader in the celadon issue led by les at the dance shipyard soli don helped put an end to communist rule in poland. Years later when the populist law
The northern port city of downs then almost exactly a year ago he was stabbed to death during a charity event. Now before that shocking attack pavel adam of which was a prominent advocate for liberal causes and a strong supporter of pro european sentiments and prior to his killing he come under massive pressure from a right Wing Hate Campaign so after his death his widow magdalena has taken up the fight against the hate speech that she says is having such a devastating impact in poland poisoning politics and threatening lifes. For a year magdalena adam ovids has been visiting her husbands grave at St Marys Church in dance. She says he stood for freedom and against polands right wing populist law and Justice Party that tramples on that freedom and that this cost him his life. He was killed by hate speech. By these troll factories. The distant from asian spread about pavel. The accusations in the defamation. Thats what killed him. In the 1980 s. Pavel at demo which was a student leader i
A powerful adam of which was a prominent advocate for liberal causes and a strong supporter of pro european sentiments and prior to his killing hed come under massive pressure from a right Wing Hate Campaign so after his death his widow magdalena has taken up the fight against the hate speech that she says is having such a devastating impact in poland poisoning politics and threatening lifes. For a year magdalena has been visiting her husbands grave at St Marys Church in dansk. She says he stood for freedom and against polands right wing populist law and Justice Party that tramples on that freedom and that this cost him his life. He was killed by hate speech has suffered by these troll factories along with the distant from asian spread about pavel. The accusations in the defamation. Thats what killed him. In the 1980 s. Pavel i demo that she was a student leader in the celadon issue in the lead by less at the dance shipyard slowly dawn helped put an end to communist rule in poland. Yea