this one go, because as simon was outlining there, there are still these benefits that the chancellor s wife will receive, especially around inheritance tax. there are already questions from labour, given that she has said that she will now stop paying bash start paying taxes, does that mean she will also pay tax from previous years, that benefit that she received, also questions about how big a benefit was that for the rishi household, so i think those questions will still be where swirling around. there is also the issue of the green card. the chancellor has admitted that he had a green card whilst in office. he gaveit a green card whilst in office. he gave it up about six months ago in october of 2021. in order to have a green card for the us, it means your permanent home is there and it means you also have to pay tax on your worldwide assets. we do understand that he did pay some tax to the us. so that s also got a lot of
start paying tax in the uk on her worldwide start paying tax in the uk on her worldwide assets, does that mean she will also worldwide assets, does that mean she will also pay any tax from previous years. will also pay any tax from previous years. that will also pay any tax from previous years, that benefit that she received, also questions about how bil received, also questions about how bin a received, also questions about how big a benefit was that for the rishi household? i think those questions will still household? i think those questions will still be swirling around. there is also will still be swirling around. there is also the will still be swirling around. there is also the issue of the green card. the chancellor has admitted that he had a the chancellor has admitted that he had a green card whilst he was in office had a green card whilst he was in office he had a green card whilst he was in office. he gave it up about six months office. he gave it up ab
if if nancy wants to drain the swamp, she s in a position, she s speaker, she can get the rules of the ethics committee changed and drain the swamp. if congress people wanted to raise money for charities, there are also plenty of charities out there, they don t necessarily have to create their own? true. and donations made in honor of members of congress that go to charities that are completely unrelated to those individual members, that does happen as well. you know, they re if you re just raising money for some other charity, it doesn t have your name on it, it s not as big a benefit to you. you can t then have the present the check as many of these members of congress, they collect the funds and present the check, and they get a double bonus because they can appear to be the hero for the community that s delivering more money. eric, your reporting on this continues to be outstanding, and you focused on this story in the new york times in great detail today. appreciat
may not be served. the ethics rules can be changed if if nancy wants to drain the swamp, she s in a position, she s speaker, she can get the rules of the ethics committee changed and drain the swamp. eric, i don t want to seem too cynical, but if congress people wanted to raise money for charities, there are plenty of charities out there. they don t have to necessarily crow ate their own? true. and donations made in honor of members of congress that go to charities that are completely unrelated to those individual members, that does happen as well. you know, they re if you re just raising money for some other charity, it doesn t have your name on it, it s not as big a benefit to you. it s true. you can t then have the you can t present the check as many of these members of congress, they collect the funds and then present the check and they get a double bonus, because they can appear to be sort the hero for the community that s delivering more money. eric, your reportin
matter of perception. it s a matter of having other factors come into play when a member of congress is deciding what to do for a company, what to do for a friend. and the public interest may or may not be served. the ethics rules can be changed if if nancy wants to drain the swamp, she s in a position, she s speaker, she can get the rules of the ethics committee changed and drain the swamp. if congress people wanted to raise money for charities, there are also plenty of charities out there, they don t necessarily have to create their own? true. and donations made in honor of members of congress that go to charities that are completely unrelated to those individual members, that does happen as well. you know, they re if you re just raising money for some other charity, it doesn t have your name on it, it s not as big a benefit to you. you can t then have the present the check as many of these members of congress, they collect the funds and present the check, and they get