by the same groups. wall street, the business round table, the chamber of congress, and the koch brothers. driving u.s. multinational interests throughout, we ve seen it going back to president clinton, in which he talked about china entering the world of nations and playing by the same rules as did p george bush, as did m president obama, and it s been nothing more than a pipe dream and the reality has been trillions of dollars lost in economic growth for this country, millions of middle-class jobs lost, as you know. tucker: what does that mean? you see china cheating on the mic under the terms of its mentorship and you decide to do nothing about it, have you conve yourself you are helping america by allowing china cheat? they were convincing themselves with a considerable amount of grace and the systems from, a gun, k, lobbyists, the
out there carrying the banner for free trade. what did you make of that, as a long-time conservative? the absurdity is, liberals don t understand economics to begin with or they wouldn t be liberals. secondly, the idea that this president is trying to reverse the consequences of all of those misbegotten concepts, values, and ideas over the course of three decades, he is really the only one who has the guts to stand up over the course of these three decades. i imagine this, and say, we are not going to take it anymore, we are going to focus in the middle class, focus on traditional american values, and search u.s. leadership once again, at least over ther free world, if not our own future. this president is going a long waysng toward asserting that control of our future. he s the only one talking aboutl the future. tucker: i don t want to oversimplify, evenn if the midde class has withered and died, no
round of presidential elections, all the candidates said, we ll take our poor people and send them to mexico. we ll help themm get into mexico and go on welfare there. would you see that that is a provocative threat? would you blame mexico for that? that s an excellent question, tucker. tucker: it is. thank you. in the campaign, we heard president trump refer to mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals, a we ve heard unfound criticisms about mexico, while we are neighbors and strategic partners and tucker: we are not strategic partners. are you kidding me? we float the kleptocracy of mexico through our pinal benev. mexico is a corrupt country run by a tiny oligarchy of blond people for their own benefit and we make that possible. the u.s. does, too. mexico has corrupt politicians but it s not a corrupt country. it s a great country. tucker: then why are people fleeing at? they are making mexico great
maybe michael will have a nice house, maybe a mansion. thankful for their support that they wouldn t spend that money on the lawyers but on him and his future, on their son. tucker: i m trying to discern meaning here. if you love something, you get for free, which i understand. if i love a rolex watch, do i get it for free, if i really love it? this is apparent in a child. if you are a parent, you re always apparent. she s always a mom. if it is on, he s always a sign. they should always love each other. they shouldn t hire lawyers against each other in court. tucker: but one of love the watch and i need to know what time it is becauseha otherwise, you need to know what time it is. i love that watch. as a sincere love. why were they call the cops on me? it s about responsibility. she gave birth to that child, you do not give birth to that watch. that s different. his mother should understand, it s your responsibility.
vessel establishment, who are multinationals and focused, so s all about who is owned, and both have been owned by the establishment for all this time. what happens with president trump? the fact is he is the only candidate with the guts, courage, the principal, and the understanding of both business and economics, as well as national security, to have attacked the establishment and the consequences of their horrible policies that they followed in both trade and national security over the past threeti decades. tucker: so the bipartisan response to trump s mentioning how we are getting hurt by china by these trade agreements was to say, even among liberals, you can t tamper with the precepts of free trade, you ll startad trade war, people who never free trade before were