news in the first week of 2024. the supreme court announces-able here at case on trump s ballot eligibility under the 14th and that meant. as president biden plays out the stakes of this election in the starkest terms to date. jamie raskin is here with his reaction and he s coming up first. plus, maine secretary of state, shannon ballot, joins me after in her state. a decision that is pulled once these appeals play out. also today, with eight days until the iowa caucus, i m gonna talk to someone who spends a lot of time in focus groups with voters. and later, we love player steps down from a top nra, as his corruption trial gets underway in new york. we ll take a look at the damage that he did and the future of americas okay, i really believe that sometimes we all just need to acknowledge how insane this moment we re living in really is. think about it this way, friday was of course january 5th, one day before the third anniversary of the january 6th insur
her original ruling. she wrote, quote, i am mindful that in the secretary of state has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on section 3 of the 14th amendment. i am also mindful, however, that no presidential candidate has ever before a engaged in insurrection. that s the point of all of this. joining me now is maine secretary of state, shenna bellows. secretary bellows, it s great to see you. thank you for taking the time. i just want to start with the news that broke on friday night, with the supreme court announcing it would take up the colorado case. we re all trying to understand kind of what this means. help us understand. this is putting your decision on hold, but it s not necessarily binding on your decision, if i understand correctly. is it possible that the supreme court could rule against colorado, and your decision could still stay in place? is not in the realm of possible? good morning, thank you for having me. it s a snowy day here in the grea
a compulsive liar, and a danger to the public. such a good name, no question that speech on friday was intended to do exactly that. i also, since i have you, i want to ask you about some big news, there was a lot of big supreme court news, the big news about the 14th amendment. it s understandable, in my view, i m sure yours as well to be skeptical a bit of the supreme court. given a number of their rulings. they have ruled in cases related to trump, kind of against him in scenarios, excluding ones about the release of documents, et cetera. how confident are you that they can be impartial in this 14th amendment case given there s no historic precedent, but that s the point of them facing at? it s true, the court has ruled a few times against donald trump. the arguments that he advances are so outlandish, agree just, that even the people on the court who he thinks oh hem, do
Transcripts for MSNBC Inside With Jen Psaki 20240604 00:01:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
reading the text of the constitution, understanding what the original purpose and meaning is, and implementing it, i haven t seen anything serious advance that donald trump did not participate in insurrection on january six, on the contrary, he was the mastermind and the ringleader of the whole thing. it s so hard to get it to trump s mind, i don t do it too often, it seems pretty clear that he s been trying to pressure the court in some ways. he said in the wake of the news, i hope we get fair treatment, if we don t our country is in big trouble. do you hear that as attempts to intimidate the justices or pressure them, how she would be hearing that? yeah, already you could hear in the right-wing media about how justice kavanaugh owes him, donald trump it s a mob stir form of justice where it s not important what