somebody like trump who only reads big sharpy block letter language, which leads me to think if the counsel thought it was illegality would have been caveated and couched. it would have been explicit in bold letters. there was some history of the mcgahn counsel s office having a chief of staff who took notes. of the mcgahn counsel s office at one point sort of straining the law and telling trump that firing comey wasn t advisable. there was a history of the white house counsel s office under prior white house counsels writing things to file such as firing mueller could be viewed as obstruction of fis. as bizarro as this white house was there was at least some faint muscle memory to writing
roosevelt room and the president had written in marker there was no collusion. he made that very clear with the big that big sharpy he always uses. he says there was meddling u it was russia. but, there was no collusion. nonetheless, even though he has clarified it over the last 48 hours, there has been a lot of trump derangement syndrome. stption just as serious to me as the cuban missile crisis in terms of an attack or the 9/11 attack. what we saw yesterday was collusion witting or unwitting in the president s words and altitudes towards putin. somebody needs to make it clear to president trump that his behavior in that press conference was unamerican, outrageous, ridiculous, stupid. had you a one word reaction to what you saw yesterday, treenge. treason, yeah. there have you got john
has reported that there are only two memos that comey gave to his friend that had any classified information. one of them he went through and redacted out the classified information. and the other one wasn t classified at the time. it was only classified later on. so it seems like his course of conduct here was fairly inoffensive. you can t very well blame him if a document wasn t classified until a later point in time. that kind of retroactive liability, i think he could argue is unfair. laura: tom dupree is self-redaction legit here? he can then redact and say, look, i m going to give it to my pal and going to get it to the press. i will get my big sharpy and block out foreign intel names. even comey s defenders would admit he is walking a very fine line here. the difference between criminal jeopardy and innocent is where you draw the line with the sharpy. my goodness. i wouldn t want to be in jim comey s shoes.
there are only two memos that comey gave to his friend that had any classified information. one of them he went through and redacted out the classified information. and the other one wasn t classified at the time. it was only classified later on. so it seems like his course of conduct here was fairly inoffensive. you can t very well blame him if a document wasn t classified until a later point in time. that kind of retroactive liability, i think he could argue is unfair. laura: tom dupree is self-redaction legit here? he can we americans with disabilities act. get it to my pal going to get it to the press. i will get my big sharpy and block out foreign intel names. even comey s defenders would admit he is walking a very fine line here. the difference between criminal jeopardy and innocent is where you draw the line with the sharpy.