Here s how you re subsidizing left-wing advocacy in the Supreme Court iwf.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from iwf.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Top law firms spent countless pro bono hours writing amicus briefs in the Supreme Court – with most of these briefs advocating high-priority progressive causes.
It's too early to say that this is a must-win game, but folks, tonight's matchup against the Carolina Hurricanes is a mighty important one. If the Capitals are going to go dancing in April, these are the games they need to win to distinguish themselves. “I can’t overstate the importance of the next couple weeks…
number one is trump s overarching election like that he is the real winner of an election that change the outcome. the indictment has numerous trump officials, trump himself appointed had told him this narrative was baseless, groundless, false. but he kept deploying it anyway. line number two is the lie that big pro trump electors won by were re-electors obviously we re. not lies number three and four i thought were to remarkable lives really did to trump s pressure on the administration. trump also tried to get doj to give a government stamp of approval to a slice by sending official letters to key states saying that they had identified concerns with the election bill. of course i m not. trump urged top doj officials to just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the republican congressman. line under five is that he had the part to object biden electoral votes on january six 2021. pence and white house had repeatedly told front that this would be illegal,
w i know if those claims are true or not. what i do know is that one or two things is happening heree or either we either they re telling the truth. and that is something that obviousle truth iny would be th story in human history or we have people in really important positions in government who are crazy and who arzy e there makingd up stories and who are still in positions of importance. eitherwho are one is a big pro. so we ve got to figure out which one of these two it is becausee of the the second on particular would be very troubling. but we don t all wpartice e know with claims that people made these are credible people and have done and continue to do important workthat do for the c. and by law, we re required when they come forwardhistle as whistleblowers to take their claims seriously and to investigatbl e. but we just don t know. that s the answer. thato rubio, great to see you. thank you, sir. all right. tonight, our two tiered justic. e system is alive and well under bid