notice. this is a violation of law. he doesn t have the credentials this is not just a rule, it is for foreign policy experience or the law. anything like that. there must be mr. chairman, i think his plan is going to be to do what he wants to do. this is a violation of the opened meetings law. that is to implement a conservative agenda for the it requires at least two hours state. and through the collective notice. what have you done? bargaining changes, he s helped to undercut the funding source for democratic politicians in excuse me the state. if you look at where tom barrett raised most of his money, even though he was not the choice of that was how they did it. labor unions that s where he got his money. by hook or by crook and in an atmosphere of utter chaos and there was a report in the wall street journal saying numg ber lawlessness in wisconsin, they of people who belong to the main public employee union in did it. wisconsin is down by more than the republicans
including the fact that a preferred risk policy flowing into wisconsin to support scott walker. starts as low as $129 a year. this is the brass ring. for an agent, call the number this is not just to win now but that appears on your screen. forever. grab it. you have got to succeed at this! free-credit-score-dot-com sur boargonna direct you ts and this is how that ended up looking inside wisconsin. to check your credit score before it gets too late this is what the money ended up looking like in this recall and you end up strapped for cash election that ended tonight. patching your board with duct tape this is to scale. so hit free-credit-score-dot-com on the left, the big circle? find out what credit s about that s the overall amount of or else you could be headed for a credit wipeout money that went to the scott walker side. the red part is the portion of that money that s from out of state. so as you can see a vast majority of the moun is from out of state
florida, including the state s governor, ric scott, have not made any public noises to the effect that they ll stop the purge in response to the justice department s demand but depend f depending on what the state does in the next 24 hours, this issue about florida s voting purge and this confrontation with the federal justice department over it, this will become a big deal. set your google news alert on that. lastly, what is never likely to become a big deal, because for some reason republicans never get in trouble for stuff like this. even when democrats do. likely to never become a big deal but you should know is going on in american politics today. that s this. this is where mitt romney is holding a super big-dollar fund raise tonight in texas. you can t go unless you give the republican party $50,000, or you bundle together, $200,000 in donations. if you re the kind of person that can put your hand on that kind of money for republican purposes you re the kind of person who can din
mention at the top of the question there, she is a proponent of publicly financed elections, she has been forever. but she does, in fact, lay out what she sees as the plan that democrats need to follow in order to get out of this structural mess they are now in, in which structurally, over time, in a way that is not attributable to any one candidate or any one race, they are at a almost critically crippling disadvantage. here s her plan. we are in a situation where there is endless this is not about well, should we put money here, put money endless money that does not have to make a decision about one race or another. so you have endless money just with misrepresentations suffocating the system. you have voter suppression, voter suppression, like some of the same people who were elected in 2010 at the state levels and the rest, suppressing the vote. 20 states have initiatives that are in place or on the way to suppress the vote. and you have poisoned the debate
but she does, in fact, lay out what she sees as the plan that democrats need to follow in order to get out of this structural mess they are now in, in which structurally, over time, in a way that is not attributable to any one candidate or any one race, they are at a almost critically crippling disadvantage. here s her plan. we are in a situation where there is endless this is not about well, should we put money here, put money endless money that does not have to make a decision about one race or another. so you have endless money just with misrepresentations suffocating the system. you have voter suppression, voter suppression, like some of the same people who were elected in 2010 at the state levels and the rest, suppressing the vote. 20 states have initiatives that are in place or on the way to suppress the vote. and you have poisoned the debate with the dialogue. suffocate the system, suppress