on where she stands on keystone. it s not a difficult, gray decision. she knows so much about the pipeline, she should have the most informed opinion, yet she know its to hide behind president obama. is that indifference because he s a sitting president, or is it because of an intellectual qualm with the entire project? i think she s really stuck in a pretzel on the pipeline. i don t think it has anything to do with president obama. she s come out in decisions on other key issues on this side of the president and against the president, like the arctic drilling issue. i think it s because she has former transcanada lobbyist on her staff. she takes a lot of big oil money. she needs to make a decision, no matter what the president decides. she needs to come out and tell us where she stands on tar sands. have you happy with bernie sanders position on keystone and energy? it look, senator sanders has not only visited with land owners and tribal nations, he s been very clear from day
didn t. i think ashley mads andison and parent company are the real villains. the idea they could have such sloppy data storage even when they are charging user to have their data scrubbed, looks like it wasn t all that effective. and to those who want to cheat or have some fun at a racy site, use a burner e-mail address. and always know that even the identity t fact that you have any account there could come back to bite you in the butt. what about okay in terms of the information for the e-mail address but if people have to use their real names on credit cards, is that the catch 22 there for them? that is one catch 22. when you sign up for a shady site like this you are often askedo give credit card information because they do want money out of you eventually and it is a way to validate you are real. but the other thing is a lot of sites now, even google, requires
dana: as you may know, al gore recently sold the cable network to arab-owned al-jazeera to the tune of about $100 million. now mr. gore is hitting the talk show circuit to promote a new book. matt lauer confronted the hi pock analysisry of selling out to operation financed by big oil money. listen. here is the guy that just sold current tv to al-jazeera which gets undetermined amount of funding from the country of qatar, which gets its money from oil reserves. isn t there a contradiction in that? i certainly understand that chris schism. i disagree with it, because i think al-jazeera has long since established itself as a really distinguished a effective news gathering organization. by the way get funding from a country that bases its wealth on fossil fuels. and fossil fuels are the enemy, you targeting climate
dana: as you may know, al gore recently sold the cable network to arab-owned al-jazeera to the tune of about $100 million. now mr. gore is hitting the talk show circuit to promote a new book. matt lauer confronted the hi pock analysisry of selling out to operation financed by big oil money. listen. here is the guy that just sold current tv to al-jazeera which gets undetermined amount of funding from the country of qatar, which gets its money from oil reserves. isn t there a contradiction in that? i certainly understand that chris schism. i disagree with it, because i think al-jazeera has long since established itself as a really distinguished a effective news gathering organization. by the way get funding from a country that bases its wealth on fossil fuels. and fossil fuels are the enemy, you targeting climate
taxes. if that s the case, we will be happy to correct the record and give mr. gore all the time he wants on the record to set things straight. but i think we all know that old al-isn t coming on this program. he never has and i didn t believe he ever will because we have problems with hypocrites in the no spin zone. and al well knows it. and that s the memo. now for the top story tonight. reaction. also president obama s immigration gun control point of view, which is coming up. with us, bob beckel one of the co-host of the five here on fnc. let s get to al gore first. this article in the new york times written by a liberal guy. right. so he is not looking to harpoon gore. looks like it s true. he tried to jam the thing last week to get the lower capital gains and you say? i would say 20% of it and one of his partners joe hyatt who i know big conservative businessman of course any will get in more capital gains make more money.