Know what question never once crossed my mind . Who played for clarence tomlinsons motor home . But as soon as the New York Times asked the question, i felt like, okay, im going to read the article. But do i really have to . Im just gonna find out the name of the rich guy who paid for him. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is gonna join us with his reactions to the latest turn in the road, so to speak, for Clarence Thomas. The Supreme Court ethics thing, i feel like its a banging your head against the wall, because the more on planetary and consequential the ethical like, literally, financial, ethical Conflict Of Interest issues are exposed, just the clear it gets they dont feel they need to answer anybody, they dont feel constrained by any rules, no matter what you expose, theyre never gonna do anything about it. I feel like Sheldon Whitehouse is the one member of the u. S. Senator was consistent consistently optimistic that something can and should be done. So, im glad youve got him. I will
Felt like, okay, im going to read the article. But do i really have to . Im just gonna find out the name of the rich guy who paid for him. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is gonna join us with his reactions to the latest turn in the road, so to speak, for Clarence Thomas. The Supreme Court ethics thing, i feel like its a banking your head against the wall, because the more on planetary and consequential the ethical like, literally, financial, ethical Conflict Of Interest issues are exposed, just the clear it gets they dont feel they need to answer anybody, they dont feel constrained by any rules, no matter what you expose, theyre never gonna do anything about it. I feel like Sheldon Whitehouse is the one member of the u. S. Senator was consistent consistently optimistic that something can and should be done. So, im glad youve got him. I will ask him how his head feels. [laughter] very good. Thank you, rachel. Thank you. Well, weve had a flurry of motions filed tonight by Donald Trumps curre
criticizing the changes that the trump team wanted to make. but when you look at it, how big is the difference between these two positions, and where do you expect the judge to come down? as a practical matter, the difference is modest. but as a philosophical matter, it is enormous. and it is for the reasons andrew says. we go to great care and expanse to have a trial process that is fair, under certain rules, the way evidence is used, the way witnesses come in, the way jurors are hopefully impartial at the beginning, and the mindset that trump and lauro are advocating for openly is exactly whether it s in small measure or large measure, to be able to pick and choose. and that s the only possible reason, to be able to try the case and the press, i. e. pollute the jury pool, or to call out individual witnesses, as he did to pence, i. e. in intimidating witnesses. those are the two big lookout for judge chutkan. also to your point, that little