degree on property that ought to be returned would result in reputational harm of a decidedly different order of magnitude. new york times points this out, quote, her ruling seemed to carve out a special exception to the normal legal process for the former president and reject the justice department s implicit argument that trump be treated like any other investigative subject. there are significant questions on how her new ruling will work, especially since the special master is permitted to review documents based on trump s claims of executive privilege. they re claims that have been rejected by the current head of the executive branch, that would be president joe biden. from the times reporting, quote, after trying for months to get the documents back from trump, the national archives, the agency that safeguards presidential records told his lawyers in a letter in may that both the justice department and the biden white house did not believe the former president s execut
invasion started back in 2014. and people here mainly have one main question which is what is biden s red line? putin has made his red line with nato very clear. for example, does the invasion mean, hey, if you go beyond the donbas region and take every the entire donbas, because a lot of people don t know that a lot of donbas is under ukrainian control. does thatun mean invasion surrounding the city of kyiv, does invasion mean that you re taking the city of mariupol which will i was at recently. so people feel there s a very blurred line that the west is used with regards to invasion. as far as they re concerned it s been ongoing eight years. we ve been talking about the big lie in america for a long time. this is another sort of big lie, right? there s a narrative coming out of vladimir putin about the role
is a very blurred mind that the west is using in regards to invasion. because as far as they are concerned, it has been ongoing for eight years. we have been talking about the big lie in america for a long time. but this is another sort of big lie, right? there is a narrative that is coming out of vladimir putin about the role of ukraine historically, and its relationship to russia, which doesn t iranians their agency. it does deny them history. russia would like the world to believe that it is just all part of russia. listen, i think that you will appreciate what i am about to say. i am still riding on this. this is no more than putin s critical ukraine theory. he has essentially made up lies about a country that he feels should have never left the country. criticism self, i
main question which is, what is biden s red line? putin has made his red line very clear. for example, what does the invasion mean? does it mean that if you go beyond this region and take over the entirety of it, because a lot of people do not know that donbass is still in ukrainian control, does it mean an invasion mean that you are taking the city of mary opal, which i was not fairly recently. people here are confused, they feel that this is a very blurred mind that the west is using in regards to invasion. because as far as they are concerned, it has been ongoing for eight years. we have been talking about the big lie in america for a long time. but this is another sort of big lie, right? there is a narrative that is coming out of vladimir putin about the role of ukraine historically, and its relationship to russia, which