bill: thanks for staying with us. i m bill o reilly in the is it legal segment tonight on june 27th. 19-year-old audrey jarvis a senior at soma state university in california was working at the school when an administrator approached her and told her to remove the cross she was wearing around her neck. i work for an on campus organization and i was told to remove my necklace so that i wouldn t offend somebody and i was as a christian person it was, you know, something that it is something that is very important to me and i hold very dear to my heart. i felt as though i had to be ashamed of my faith and that s not something i m comfortable with at all. bill: last night under the threat of legal action sonoma state apologized to audrey saying their actions were quote inappropriate. with us now is kimberly gill foreign oil and lis wiehl. is the story over? is that it. the story has come to an
but even if it s big, she has a right to wear it? she has an absolute right in a state school, freedom of expression. bill: we don t know whether she is going to litigate? she has got to show damages. it s been resolved so there is not going to be a financial recovery here. i think it s important for declaratory judgment so it doesn t happen to other people. she could tattoo a cross on herself if she wants. what are they going to do tell her to go home and scrub it off? bill: wisconsin a number of other states. tighten up abortion laws and make them 20 weeks or down to eliminate late term abortions that now science has proven the babies feel pain. but, a federal judge. you know it was going to happen. now is trying to block the law in wisconsin. tell me what the law exactly says. the law in wisconsin is not about the 19 weeks or the 2 o0 weeks. the law in wisconsin passed a month ago says, look, if you are a doctor and you want to perform an abortion in wisconsin, you hav
appropriate resolution which is the university has apologized. they said they are going to discipline the supervisor that was with this associated student s group. they showed campus tours because is he still under their purview. and it was improper to tell her to remove the cross so she can carry the cross. why is this happening to begin with? she has a first amendment freedom of expression for her religion. why? bill: i don t know if improper is the right word. it s outrageous. it s unconstitutional. here is another word for you. bill: if you want to put a cross or star of david or crescent for the muslims around your neck. disturbing. put it that way. is she going to sue? is she going to take this further? she brought a letter saying i want an apology. this has been happening not just this one time but upsetting incidents. bill: that s a big cross though and that s a cross in play, right? that looks like the cross sister mary larona in the 3rd grade. almost hit me in t
why is this happening to begin with? she has a first amendment freedom of expression for her religion. why? bill: i don t know if improper is the right word. it s outrageous. it s unconstitutional. here is another word for you. bill: if you want to put a cross or star of david or crescent for the muslims around your neck. disturbing. put it that way. is she going to sue? is she going to take this further? she brought a letter saying i want an apology. this has been happening not just this one time but upsetting incidents. bill: that s a big cross though and that s a cross in play, right? that looks like the cross sister mary larona in the 3rd grade. almost hit me in the nose. but even if it s big, she has a right to wear it? she has an absolute right in a state school, freedom of expression. bill: we don t know whether she is going to litigate? she has got to show damages. it s been resolved so there is not going to be a financial recovery here. i think it s imp
declaratory judgment so it doesn t happen to other people. she could tattoo a cross on herself if she wants. what are they going to do tell her to go home and scrub it off? bill: wisconsin a number of other states. tighten up abortion laws and make them 20 weeks or down to eliminate late term abortions that now science has proven the babies feel pain. but, a federal judge. you know it was going to happen. now is trying to block the law in wisconsin. tell me what the law exactly says. the law in wisconsin is not about the 19 weeks or the 2 o0 weeks. the law in wisconsin passed a month ago says, look, if you are a doctor and you want to perform an abortion in wisconsin, you have to have privileges at a local hospital within 30 miles of the clinic. and the idea being the proponents of this law said, you know, we want you to have privileges. if something happens to a woman after an abortion. bill: you need to get to a hospital does that make sense to you. that makes sense you