guess we re going to explain its all in this specialn of edition of the ingraham angle . the twitter files. fe now, a few years back ,vative conservatives started noticing that their tweets weren taction getting the traction they once did. tnow the common parlance became known as shadow manning. the effort to suppress orthe re amplify the reach of certainac voices. now, this was so concerning that former ceo jack dorsey was brought before congress to answer questions about it. fore are you censoring people? no. peo twitter shadow banning prominent republicans thad. is that true? no. well, he was doing intermittent fasting and so he can.jack dor now, tonight, jack dorsey better be lawyering up because it sure looks like he lied plder oath, playing kind of a gameay of semantics there. now, a little over two hours ago, former new york times columnist and free speech champion barry weiss began dropping more of those internal twitter files that showed justhe how dedica
to facebook and to good to google to match that kind of openness because frankly, they ve been at least as bad for google in some ways has been worse, i think, than than was twitter. and so these these systems are so gigantic. they are s, theyo powerful aul and there s so muc,h in everybody s lives thatth they have to be transparent orey we re going to have to do something pretty dramatic to limit their capacitamaticy. well, i mean, isn t this nowa beyond obvious that congress does have to step in here? i mean, republicans alwaysre wae to take a hands off approachyo to big business. but we ve seen and you and i have talked about this thatusins time and again, big businesss,, not the 80s anymore. haths become diametrically opposed to the american tradition of fre e speech, sec second amendment, parental rights, et cetera, entalt ceter, and the weakness in the disinformation campaigns. all of that is part of it. i look, what you re seeing is isog what originally fascism was all about
necessarily sure i buy that argument. i don t think that is what is driving our unemployment. it is a much bigger issue, a global issue in fact, than just cutting regulations. but you know, i don t disagree with the idea that some regulations on small businesses need to be cut. at the same time i think we need more regulations on some big businesss. bill: take the first point, you agree with what rich is saying. that is what i hear. it happens sometimes. every now and then. but look, i mean the obama administration, first 26 months there are 75 major new regular layings costing regulations costing $40 billion. why in a really soft economy would you want to layering more burdens on to business. it makes no sense. i think republicans have a very strong race for regulatory moratorium, stopping all regulations until unemployment is at a decent level again. 6% is in that bill congressman kelly was promoting on the floor there. bill: by the way mike kelly went to university of notre
business pact are we discriminating on big businesss? we focus on women because there are a number of issues that are important with regard to women in the economy, women in safety and women in education that are distinct and important. we re proud to host the conference. the white house is hosting a conference as you heard there on women s issues. and the administration is saying and insisting it has nothing to do with the november election. women s issues have been coming up of late. the president has been speaking out how he is doing with women voters as well. well will make up their own mind in election about who is advancing the issues they care most deeply about. there are millions of strong women around the country to make their determination about a whole range of issues. it s not just narrowly focused on contraception.
should make more money. to be fair gary, 18 states and dc are nickel above. many states go above with their own requirements. this is a few states as wayne pointed out a few moments ago. this is not the country. government can guarantee and set wages, but they cannot guarantee the jobs. it is simple as that and it is a known fact, you dictate cost to business. business will react to the costs and you can say 30 cents all youment. a lot of big businesss and the costs do add up. i rather not a minimum wage. business will do their job and market speaks for itself. and the person will walk to the next door and raise the price to attract it. let the market be the guide. cheryl if i can say in the free market, in letting it go as it has gone with the minimum wage not increased we