harm that he s done to the united states over the years and leaking classified information. i wouldn t want anything to do with someone like that who i saw as someone who is a threat to the united states and our own security. so no, i wouldn t. do you see the president pardoning manafort? i would say if i was advising, i would say not to do so and not to even speculate about doing so. i think the president gets upset about these things. everything as this investigation winds down, they are going to get closer to him because that is part of the whole process here. if he doesn t keep some modicum of temperament, it s just not going to play out well for him. i don t believe the president has been involved with any collusion. i don t think he knows anything about any russian i agree with sarah sanders and i don t think they have done anything to impede the investigation.
is a major enterprise investigation, the fact that all of these people and this far into the investigation continue to lie to investigators i think is definitely notable. so that is definitely a pattern that has taken place. we are going to take a quick break. the breaking news the president made when he spoke with the washington post including why he does not believe his own expert s on global warming. we will get a look at the senate runoff in mississippi. so, that goal you ve been saving for, you can do it. we can do this. at fidelity, our online planning tools are clear and straightforward so you can plan for retirement while saving for the things you want to do today. -whoo! while saving for the things [deep breath] i receive travel rewards. i visualize travel rewards. going new places! going out for a bite! going anytime. rewarded!
i m wondering if you know that the meeting took place and if you remain confident in the white house s repeated denials that no campaign officials were involved in the discussions about plans to release john podesta s e-mails? certainly i remain confident in the white house s assertion that the president was involved in no wrongdoing, was not part of any collusion. the things that have to do with mr. manafort i refer you to his attorneys. no collusion. when cnn s jim acosta asked this next question, listen to the answer. would the president recommend that mr. manafort begin to cooperate, offer full cooperation, to the special counsel s office? we can only speak to what our role is in that process and not only has the president but the entire administration has been fully cooperative with the special counsel s office providing hours and hours of sit downs as well as over 4 million pages of documents. we continue to be cooperative
salman giving the order to kill the journalist, you re probably not going to get that. but i m sure that the compilation and correlation of data from several sources, plus an understanding of how things work in saudi arabia, it s going to it led to that high confidence level that mohammed bin salman was not only implicated, was knowledgeable, but directed this killing. it s unthinkable given how saudi arabia works that this huge team involving a surgeon, a hit squad, would have carte blanche to walk into an embassy with people who are the right-hand people of mohammed bin salman. on its face the circumstantial evidence in and of itself is very compelling, and it s just completely unrealistic or people are gullible to think that didn t have some connection with mohammed bin salman, who
go ahead. he i thought was pretty clear here that he does not at all agree with the notion that it is agreed upon by all these scientists that man contributes to climate change. i think it is clear what he was saying, making some assumptions here. he is saying we have done a good job in this country reducing air emissions and cleaning up things. the places that are really bad, india, china, these don t apply to them. treaties and things. they are not doing anything on that front. have them clean up their act instead of trying to impose incredible restrictions on an economy that is pretty energy efficient and clean economy. i think that is the point he is trying to make and it is a legitimate point. it s not legitimate. the united states and china are the two largest emitters of greenhouse gas. it s a universal global problem. that s why we were the leaders in the climate change effort. we were the only country now not signed on to the paris climate agreement.