General and it was a big ask, and it got a no. What do you say about that . Lets get after it. Big news tonight. And no holds barred during mueller because he went allout to protect this president. We have the transcript of what bill taylor the top diplomat in ukraine told lawmakers in his closed door testimony on october 22nd. This is no longer about what people tell us that he said. We know what he said. Im going to take you to the wall now and give you highlights. The big deal is it that teller corroborates the ideas of a corrupt exchange which democrats argue could be an attempted bribe. The proof . Release of military aid to ukraine contingent on a public announcement the country would pursue an investigation against the bidens and hacking of the dnc. That was my clear understanding. Security assistance money would not come until the president committed to pursue the investigation. Taylor also confirms, it was all about politics. I understood that the reason for investigating buri
Whistleblower complaint. Start a Major Investigation into the bidens. Donald trump busted on saying he would take foreign help. Impeachment is imperative. The president committed crimes in office. So you say impeach . So that is a thing. The case for bribery is straightforward and everyone knows bribery is impeachable. Thats why we held up the money. We do that all the time with Foreign Policy. What you just described is a quid pro quo. Tell me what rule, law, statute has been violated. You want to point to statutes it is unlawful to solicit or receive any foreign help, which includes things of value. I think citizen set off some alarms. Pretty damning evidence. Damning slam dunk evidence. Damning that you cannot trust the president not to commit crimes. It goes to the heart of the issue of bribery. Its perfectly wrong. Its bribery. A week unlike any other. Nine different trump insiders joined 12 others to provide over 40 hours of testimony. Was there a quid pro quo . The answer is yes