watched one news clachannel and not seeing the whole story. he said it was a perfect call and he did nothing wrong and the bidens are corrupt. so it s up to some of the democrats to tell exactly what happened and say why they re supporting the impeachment inquiry and to make the impeachment inquiry something that translates to the american people. if it becomes so technical and gets bogged down in the details, it will go over people s heads. so the democrats charge here is to not only be near perfect, but also be able to translate this to the american people in a way that they can understand. the washington post did send reporters to about nine democrat town halls to try to gauge the reaction of the voters and how these vulnerable members were responding to the pressure from the voters in their swing districts. and right now it s still early, we haven t seen major signs of a political backlash. sure, slotkin gets booed particularly but she defends her position and gets a raund o
against the law if he did if there was a direct quid pro quo. the tiny sliver in which rudy giuliani has a point is that the president of the united states has broad latitude to conduct foreign affairs of the united states. now, if he s specifically exchanging something for presidential action, if you do x then i will give you foreign aid, that is a criminal offense. that is on a service what is called honest service violation. what if it is vague. we could have a better relationship if you root out corruption and let me tell you about corruption, the bidens are corrupt, blah blah if it is hinted at but not expressly set. hey, congress, are you listening. to paraphrase the president. then it becomes a question of is this a violation of the president s oath of office, is he using the power of the presidency to influence and frankly to go after his political rivals which he s already demonstrated he s willing to do and did with the clintons, hillary clinton. and this is a que