material but it is not enough. do we need to get material but it is not enough. do we need to get more material but it is not enough. do we need to get more inventive, - material but it is not enough. do we need to get more inventive, and - need to get more inventive, and melinda? i send cv issues with a nato response, it would bring nato into the war but there is another option, there is the un charter, there is article 42 of the un charter and i will read it. it says the security council consider that measures not involving the use of armed force would be inadequate or proved to be inadequate, it may take action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. and they have shown before that they can bypass the security council, that the general assembly can take a vote, so why is the united nations, which is there to defend humanity, not triggering article 42? i defend humanity, not triggering article 42? ., ., , , ., artic
anyway, midst of a war and nobody was doing anyway, i midst of a war and nobody was doing anyway, i certainly don t want to in anyway, i certainly don t want to in any way, anyway, i certainly don t want to in any way, minimise the pain and damage any way, minimise the pain and damage that is happening now, but the response is significant difference. unfortunately, take some time for difference. unfortunately, take some time for these decisions, these policies time for these decisions, these policies to time for these decisions, these policies to impact, but the alternative of sending in a nato force alternative of sending in a nato force right now into theatre, eight, doesn t force right now into theatre, eight, doesn t necessarily mean it would stap. doesn t necessarily mean it would stap. and doesn t necessarily mean it would stop, and be, a good expand. it is painful. stop, and be, a good expand. it is painful. it stop, and be, a good expand. it is painful. it
administration has done a lot of good things but they haven t stopped the bloodshed. we haven t rinsed convinced bladder may prudently stand out and there is a lot more we could be doing. i would givejoe biden a flat b. you are on a one to five scale, you will have to translate that into british standards but he made a really bad decision last week, we should have allowed the mix, the polishjets, there are 30 of them, to be transferred from poland to ukraine. but the white house is afraid of vladimir pardo putin, and we look like. we haven t intimidated putin at all and he is continuing, and we see his game plan, look at marie apple, that is going to be kyiv and kharkiv next if we don t change as planned. we are alienating the mashed russian middle class and we haven t had putin there. it is good we have got their attention and it is good we are sending defensive material but it is not enough. d0 it is good we are sending defensive
administration can step up its support administration can step up its support to ukraine without putting boots support to ukraine without putting boots on support to ukraine without putting boots on the ground. biden has made a very boots on the ground. biden has made a very dear boots on the ground. biden has made a very clear. it is time to impose a limited a very clear. it is time to impose a limited no fly zone. there are places limited no fly zone. there are places where you can put into place in ukraine, places where you can put into place in ukraine, where it will not descend in ukraine, where it will not descend into world war iii, that is a bs argument. the descend into world war iii, that is a bs argument- descend into world war iii, that is a bs aruument. ., ., .,, a bs argument. the pentagon has said the bombin: a bs argument. the pentagon has said the bombing of a bs argument. the pentagon has said the bombing of the a bs argument. the pentagon has said