change in policy? we begin america reports with the white house walking back president biden s comments about china and taiwan, and all comes as president biden faces a series of crisis here at home while claiming a recession is not inevitable. i m sandra smith in new york. great to be back with you, john. john: great to be back. let me be the first to officially well come you. the president wrapping up a trip, up and down stock market, fears that gas prices will hit $6 a gallon nationwide and potential food shortage, to leave americans scrambling to feed their fires. sandra: the president admitting it will take time to lower gas prices and ease inflation but the u.s. economy is performing better than the rest of the world. we have fox team coverage now, byron york is standing by. john: jacqui heinrich is travelling with the president live in tokyo. what about the comments regarding taiwan and china? jacqui: john, the fact the president made those comments standing
that they will argue that it s unfair the doj didn t prosecute hunter biden for this. but as elliott points out, they did prosecute abandon and peter navarro and there were others who were not prosecuted. look, i think the right word is the one that you used before in talking about this. this is a headache for the white house but ultimately it is a sideshow. joe biden has serious issues with inflation and people worrying that he is too old but it is hard to imagine there are a large amount of voters out there who would otherwise vote for joe biden but would not because of hunter biden s activities. even questionable as some of them may have been like many in washington trying to emphasize his approximated power for people to promote his own business interests. i think the republican goal here is not so much even to weekend biden president biden through hunter biden as it is to create some kind of equivalency through all of the
are alarming. now you have a white house walking back or cleaning up the remarks from the president, essentially saying he didn t know what he was talking about. yeah, it s kind of a disturbing pattern. you go back to the ukraine situation when the president suggested that a press conference that maybe a minor incursion by russia would be acceptable, then they walked that back, russia invades, then he says chemical weapons attack by russia would be responded in kind, you mean we would attack them with weapons, so a series of comments and it s not just about does he understand what he s saying, what is he trying to say but corrected by the official white house policy, what does this mean. he s the president. he sets white house policy. the biden who is speaking is corrected essentially by the official biden through, delivered through press aides or public statements. i think he ought to stop public speaking and just communicate
of getting the votes. to your improirjts there s only one person involved in this equation that can bring this process to an end, and that s the president. i m sure he s got senatorial tendencies after having spent a lot of time in that body, but i think both speaker pelosi last week and president biden through press secretary john saki are showing their angst in leading this process to come to its natural end. i think that s the beginning of moving toward that? i want to get you to react to something charlie cook wrote. it s a grim picture he s drawing. parties taking over have two basic dangers. the first is overreaching, going further than those voters in the middle can stomach. the second danger is appearing to be ineffective or even incompetent. they are getting killed on overreach and incompetence.
Ghani sagt Biden Mithilfe für US-Truppenabzug zu orf.at - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from orf.at Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.