yeah, certainly of that biden administration eked out a victory here. it s not too surprising with the lineup. and this is a classic roberts decision. it s accommodating and narrow. brought along justice kavanaugh here. when cavanagh was appointed, i wrote a column saying while president trump said he was looking for someone who would not be a john roberts, he could not found one who is more similar in his approach. the opinion like this where you see that s true. and they cut from the same both. they tend to be more incremental and narrow. in this case, they are reversing the decision and saying that the court of appeals was wrong to say that this was a violation of federal law. it is a very narrow decision in that sense. today as a whole, and sort of a split judgment for about biden administration. quite frankly, the laws on the epa side will be felt more
dialect or border patrol or not. 18 of 25. this is a terrible decision for america. this is a terrible decision for taxes. we alone in texas are spending $4 million this year in border security. we normally spend 400 million. a $4 billion. that s more than some states have a total budget. this is only going to allow biden to thump s chest and say i m right in the floodgates are going to be open. we are approaching by the time his term ends if you look at the mit report from 2016 which sent 26 million people here illegally and at his numbers, we are going to be somewhere near 40 million people here illegally. we cannot absorb that in our cities and counties and states. it s dangerous for america. people are coming here from 150 countries. one last stat to give you a sense of how big this is in
the ninth amendment and the 14th amendment and why privacy is considered as part of the constitutional guarantee. and they just wiped it all out. and so i m the only president to god. and i am feeling extremely strongly that i will do everything in my power as well as push the congress and the public. the bottom line is if you care if the polling data is correct and you think this decision by the court was an outrage or significant mistake, vote. show up and vote. vote in the off year and vote, vote, vote. that is how we will change it. all right, guys. now, there is no such thing as a quick one. i m out of here. thank you all very much.
is very destabilizing down there in south texas and arizona and so forth. dana: will be epa decision have any impact on businesses here immediately in terms of either exploration or as i warned us about the reporting requirements that the government would try to put on them? now, i think immediately, i m sure, legal actions and corporate actions are going to occur. the epa now is going to be way on the defensive. all of these regulations and rules imposed by the obama administration are subject to question all of a sudden. this is why it is such an important decision. it cuts to the very core of the bidens climate change, so-called prenew deal. the idea of going net carbon emissions in 5 or 10 years. a cuts to the core of that. you re going to see major
if congress is ambiguous in its law, we will defer to the federal regulatory agencies who will then decide. they will make their own laws. they will make their own rules. i think a new balance has been struck. john roberts has always been very good on these economic regulatory issues. it s a 6-3 decision. it basically says, you want to have that kind of carbon policies, carbon emissions policies, you need to clarify and get a law. which by the way, i don t think they could. this is about how you measure clean air. it also is about how many times you measure the same air, which is what the obama s wanted and what the biden crowd is wanting to do. measure it many times. there s also a federal versus state issue year. federalism. it is essentially saying, i ll have to to read this decision obviously. i think it s in the say that the