a whole lot of bipartisanship is needed to get this deal done. house financial services committee member ways and just moments from now. first, let s go to chad program on capitol hill. good evening. hinging on two things. the persuasive powers of president biden and house speaker kevin mccarthy. trying to gen up his site geared at reminding the gop his side only controls the house. i think this agreement frames all of that. it does not get everything everybody wanted. that is divided government. it is not 100% what everybody wants. when you look, the country will be stronger. this will be transformational where congress will vote to spend more money this year than we spent last year. some gop members incinerated the speaker on twitter calling the delay deterred sandwich. he also accused the speaker a fake. opposing fake mandates for people to receive benefits. i think that it is really unfortunate that the president open the door to this. not just the progressives,
happy with the details of this deal. the same thing could be set on the republican side, as you heard from the congressman who we interviewed earlier this hour. let s check in with chad program on capitol hill. he knows better than anybody what is going on. the feelings of the house of representatives. chad, you just heard what the president had to say. how does that square with what members of the house are saying? it was important for the public and democrats to cure from the president here. they have heard from the house speaker kevin mccarthy several times. today he held in other news conference. democrats need to get air cover from the president. not every democrat will be for this when they try to put this on the house floor. i thought it was interesting towards the end he was asked about, you know, if he thought the speaker had negotiated in good faith. he said, yes, and i also believe
it is what all the members are looking for and that will start this in motion. jon: you may have heard representative ralph norman of south carolina not happy that they have not seen the bill yet. the text is not available. you also said if they move it through the house. no guarantee that this deal which has been agreed to by speaker mccarthy and a couple of lieutenants along with members, representatives of the president at the white house, there is no guarantee that the house will approve it. that is right. this is kind of the longest mile, the hardest mile is at the end moving it through the house and senate. there are always these pitfalls that they encounter when they try to advance a major piece of legislation like this. mark my words, there will be something that comes up between now and wednesday night that will reveal to us some coalition or some faction that has a problem with this. overall, starting to get a little concern to your capitol hill capital hill. i was told tha
a whole lot of bipartisanship is needed to get this deal done. house financial services committee member ways and just moments from now. first, let s go to chad program on capitol hill. good evening. hinging on two things. the persuasive powers of president biden and house speaker kevin mccarthy. trying to gen up his site geared at reminding the gop his side only controls the house. i think this agreement frames all of that. it does not get everything everybody wanted. that is divided government. it is not 100% what everybody wants. when you look, the country will be stronger. this will be transformational where congress will vote to spend more money this year than we spent last year.
they will find that i did not. mr. president, on your allies and adversaries to america, what do you think this process said to those adversaries? you have a deal now but what does a process say? it says that we move through this more than once. just the nature of the way we handle the deficit and handle whether we will each year pay our debts. it has happened more than once. it will probably happen again. it will not happen for at least another two years here. i think beyond that it will not either. do you think that it is time for the u.s. to get rid of the debt limit? no. i think causing more controversy getting rid of the debt limit. i am exploring the idea that we would at a later date a year or two from now decide whether or not the 14th amendment, how that actually would impact on whether or not you need to continue the