. and by the way, this judge plan is a plan. she s tied to the kavanaugh and the russia hoax, and she s in the same social circles as merrick garland. and once this reaches the supreme court, the circus is going to get shut down. but this wasn t the only time assassination was brought up today. two journalists were caught on the hot mic right outside of trump s courthouse. listen. here are the worst part of the window. open news hanging out of it will be on the other side. i mean, if you think we ve got a dead heat driving with the truck window. yeah, i wasn t thinking about that. yeah, it s like a oh, maybe someone would want to kill their kids. you know what you should do if you take the convertible?
prosecutor is claiming trump could turn to a serial killer and shouldn t have blanket immunity if he goes full. charles manson and the democrat controlled three judge panel today played the assassination card. a biden appointed judge suggested trump could direct the military to assassinate his rival. listen. yes. or no question, could a president who ordered seal team six to assassinate a political rival was not impeached? he d be subject to criminal prosecution if he were impeached and convicted first. so your answer is, is bizarre. my answer is qualified. yes. there s a political process that would have to occur under the structure of our constitution, which require impeachment and conviction by the senate. forget about all of that. assassinating your political rival isn t within the bounds of your official presidential actions. you don t get elected and just start , kidnapping and assassinating americans. so you have a get out of jail free card like monopoly
criminal charges. mark meadows and scavino were not prosecuted by the biden-appointed matthew graves. hunter biden will appear before a federal judge tomorrow to answer the nine related tax charges. it is supposed to be a first appearance and potential arraignment meaning he is expected to plead not guilty. however, stranger things have happened as we saw in delaware in july. we are prepared for anything and we ll follow it. dana: i know you are. david thank you. bill: any moment now attorneys general from montana, oklahoma and missouri will testify before the house homeland security committee as republicans try to advance their push to impeach mayorkas. chad pergram watching that from the hill joins us now with the news today. good morning. one of those attorneys general is andrew bailey from missouri, the show-me state sued the
petro poroshenko fired me at the insistence of then vice president biden. there were no complaints whatsoever. no problem of how i was performing. he will course of the president of ukraine at the time now turning to washington where the irs whistleblower says if not for his testimony before congress he does not think the attorney general wo would ve nad a special counsel. the same trump appointed u.s. attorney who had been investigating country for the past five years. it shows weiss was considering not charging in january after the visit to president biden appointed attorneys declined to bring charges there. it requires people to come in and to testify and for congress it s the bottom of this. ex-president biden s reelection cochair of his reelection campaign says he has no problem with special counsel being named. the presid present has said e
by the way, little nuance here, the special counsel regulations actually say specifically, the special counsel is supposed to come from outside of government. it can t be somebody that s employed by the government. bill barr broke that when he appointed john durham a few years ago, he found this, well, i m the attorney general, can i do what i want. that s been violated again. i think it goes to this exact reason you re saying, poppy. the point of special counsel is you don t just take someone who s already been doing this and slap on a new title. fresh eyes. it doesn t change the credentials that he had going in, which is the fact that he was appointed by the former president. and that s an important thing, i think, for the political calculation. this is not somebody who president biden appointed, that a democrat appointed. it was appointed by that republican. and with democratic support. i don t think the question at this point is so much about david weiss motivation, it s jus