vice president of the united states to violate vice president of the united states to violate the constitution to simply to violate the constitution to simply declare himself the winner. he is simply declare himself the winner. he is not simply declare himself the winner. he is not entitled to do that and uses he is not entitled to do that and uses office to coerce the justice department to writing a memo declaring that the election was fraudulent which the acting attorney general fraudulent which the acting attorney general refused to do. the fraudulent which the acting attorney general refused to do. general refused to do. the point is he did not use general refused to do. the point is he did not use his general refused to do. the point is he did not use his office general refused to do. the point is he did not use his office to do i he did not use his office to do that, he brought people. what is lawyer is saying is that he got advice from councils that were very wis
leader hillary clinton injail, and elected leader who treads to throw their opponents injail for no other reason opponents injail for no other reason whatsoever is not a leader suitable reason whatsoever is not a leader suitable for democracy. culture throughout his presidency use the justice throughout his presidency use the justice department and state department and its administration in order department and its administration in order to department and its administration in order to further his electoral ambitions in violation of the law. repeated ambitions in violation of the law. repeated violations in several of the agencies during this, he was impeached for his extortion effort of fees impeached for his extortion effort of fees for impeached for his extortion effort of fees for the ukraine, threatening to withhold military aid in ukraine and must to withhold military aid in ukraine and must be investigated joe biden for him and must be investigated joe biden
president trump in the 20/20 election was his verbiage, i president trump in the 20/20 i election was his verbiage, with respect election was his verbiage, with respect to election was his verbiage, with respect to the election was his verbiage, with respect to the changing - election was his verbiage, with respect to the changing of- election was his verbiage, with respect to the changing of the i respect to the changing of the election respect to the changing of the election the respect to the changing of the election the state respect to the changing of the i election the state legislatures. respect to the changing of the . election the state legislatures. i thought election the state legislatures. i thought that election the state legislatures. i thought that was election the state legislatures. i thought that was the election the state legislatures. i thought that was the strongest i thought that was the strongest argument thought that was the strongest argument
absorb them and pardon him of any other illicit activity, absorb them and pardon him of any other illicit activity, so absorb them and pardon him of any other illicit activity, so it s - other illicit activity, so it s amazing other illicit activity, so it s amazing it s other illicit activity, so it s amazing it s unsurprising i other illicit activity, so it si amazing it s unsurprising it collapsed amazing it s unsurprising it collapsed and amazing it s unsurprising it collapsed and the - amazing it s unsurprising it collapsed and the biting i amazing it s unsurprising it| collapsed and the biting can amazing it s unsurprising it- collapsed and the biting can be and has a collapsed and the biting can be and has a problem collapsed and the biting can be and has a problem. joe collapsed and the biting can be and has a problem. joe biden collapsed and the biting can be and has a problem. joe biden has - collapsed and the biting can be and has a problem. joe biden has
territories, but has never had the chance to vote in a general election. i don t feel like i have the freedom of self expression in the political sphere. our basic rights are violated from the occupation forces. so why are we also experiencing a similar violence from what is supposed to be our own leadership? exclusive data shared with the bbc has tracked the changing views of 18 to 29 year old palestinians over the last decade. it suggests this generation shows a growing trend of dissatisfaction for their own leadership. the youth discontent is driven to a large extent by, one, the lack of legitimacy they see in the political system, without elections since 2006. so we have a president who, for the last 14 years, has been ruling without electoral legitimacy.