administration to aggressively make sure they re complying? meaning, if we find one dot missing from an i, use that as evridge to get out of the agreement? or should they not be that aggressive? i want them to aggressively oversight to make sure that iran complies with every part of the agreement no.. i don t want them on look for an excuse to break it. i m not suggesting that, but we want to make sure that iran complies with the agreement. and bingts like in we don t have strict compliance, iran will look for ways to do things they shouldn t do. on north korea, the president seemed to hint that china had made some progress with north korea of the steps were being taken. it was extraordinarily vague. what do you know some have you gotten any briefings or updates based on the president s meeting with the chinese president