It reaches the part of the activity that is unrelated to the government preventative purpose. He was not accused of communicating with for viewing the probe while of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking. To view or were respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Occupy the law does not some sleepy First Amendment corner. It is a very platforms on which americans are likely to communicate to organize for social change and to petition their government. Could the state impose that . Your honor, i think they have much more authority to impose this. And limited and i think if you had something as sweeping as this, i dont think they could do that. Justice ginsburg. The most fundamental right is taken away. Some states prohibit sit science from voting. Some states prohibits being bearing arms. Those are constitutional ites. They are different. They are fundamental but they are different. In the case of voting, North Car
An hour. Bout chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham v. North carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Goldberg mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court. There are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 202. 5 reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventative purpose. Mr. Packingham is not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment quarter. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and
Communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 2. 5 by speaking. His friends and family about his experience in traffic court. If today he would to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court that would be a felony. Second, the lot does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates in freespeech on the platforms of which America Today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change and to petition their government. Third, section is a criminal law and imposes punishment for protective First Amendment activity without any regard to individual culpability or lack of culpability. Of the state imposes restriction as a condition of payroll. Your honor, i think, they have much more authority to impose conditional parole and states do this all the time. They limit peoples First Amendment rights and if you had something that was is seen as this for life for anybody who committed a offense,. J
We talked about new protections last week, laws and regulations that make it safer for consumers in the marketplace. We talked about new kind of advocacy and activism, the National Consumers league,. We will add a layer count talk about changes in how americans sold products, market goods. These are just as important as the changes on the business side, infrastructure, in American History. One of the things we will do is talk about advertising. You may think it is a little strange to study ads in a history class. This isnt marketing. This is not business. Ads are a great historical tool. They tell us a lot about the past. This is an editorial from harper weekly, a popular magazine that circulated around the country at the end of the 19th century, still published today as a monthly. Peer is what harpers said could here is what harpers said. [reading] the story of today would not go quite that far. They are not a perfect picture of the past, but advertising is a great way to think about
We talked about new protections last week, laws and regulations that make it safer for consumers in the marketplace. We talked about new kind of advocacy and activism, the National Consumers league,. We will add a layer count talk about changes in how americans sold products, market goods. These are just as important as the changes on the business side, infrastructure, in American History. One of the things we will do is talk about advertising. You may think it is a little strange to study ads in a history class. This isnt marketing. This is not business. Ads are a great historical tool. They tell us a lot about the past. This is an editorial from harper weekly, a popular magazine that circulated around the country at the end of the 19th century, still published today as a monthly. Peer is what harpers said could here is what harpers said. [reading] the story of today would not go quite that far. They are not a perfect picture of the past, but advertising is a great way to think about