saying it s untrue, they portrayed it as a routine editing thing, and then also had the headline. and the paper comes out, and we have it right here. obama defense his response. what s your take? i think as betsy saidist perplexing they have not explained this, either the headline or the editing. there needs to be a correction a or a clarification if there was a reason behind it. i think that s more true for the editing. headlines get changed all the time and there s space considerations in print, but taking taking out that paragraph is perplexing and potential damaging. new york times got scolded by the public editor for a story about the san bernardino attacks, the female terrorist malik, the paper posted she had