magazine and coourge of the juggernaut, that is game change. isn t that fair to say? yeah, it is. fascinating. i like that vanity fair piece that willie keeps calling thick. i described it that way when i gave it as a present but nobody described it to me like that when they gave it back. mort zuckerman sw us. mort is mad at me because i m going to steal money from him playing poker tonight. is this a weekly game you guys have some. every couple of weeks. every couple of weeks. i cry in between. do either of you ever win? mort never wins. never. i have been known to win on occasion. very sporadic occasion. is it wise to bet against, say, a mort zuckerman of the world who can sort of push those chips in the middle of the table without much concern for the implications of that move? mort does not have a poker face, let s put it that way!
housing market would go, up or down, with goldman sachs playing the role of the bookie. the now governmegovernment now goldman sachs portrayed fraud. they say goldman had to find someone to bet on the other side. even if paulson had chosen the securities, why is that illegal? somebody picks a bundle of stocks or securities they wish to bet against. they then ask companies like goldm m goldman sachs to find someone to take the other side of that bet. someone betting against the stockses or securities think they re garbage. the guy betting in favor disagrees and it is that disagreement on the quality of the stocks or securities that makes the market.