kronk be a body snatcher is because you don t want the tape to mean that child was suffocated with duct tape. that s the only reason. greta: i see, okay. instead of having him snatch the body if you use the evidence as it is, that area was pull of water, deep water, floating body for a number of months. so deep the police not only did they not want to go in there. they were negligent they berated this guy for 30 minutes after they went in there in august. greta: bernie, can you add any light to this confusion i have? let s say i don t mind standing in my kitchen and kronk comes in my backyard to read my meter every four months or whatever the heck it is. for me it matter. what about june and july? where was that child been? all we get is august 11th, up. we don t have before then. to me that s a huge hole.
discovery said he call his son in november before the remains were reported to police and told him he was about to become famous. today the defense put kronk on the stand and asked him about that call. you are telling me now that you completely deny making a call to your son at all in november? my son was mistaken about that phone call. that phone call never happened. i called him on december 11th. i told him on december left thenth, that i had found something. if he looked on television that night he would be able to see me for the first time since he was 8-years-old. greta: joining us criminal defense attorney ted williams represents kronk s son. and joined by orlando attorney and bernie grim. did your client get that call from his father? well, the problem greta is because some of this is attorney/client privilege, i can really talk about the
a drowning in the pool, we want to hear it. we want to hear from casey anthonny. she s the only one that can say it. i d move to strike the whole opening statement of the defense if they ever get there which i don t think they can. bernie, i ll go to you on this one. the defense brought it up. they brought a burden of proof on themselves. we all know they zront a burden but said it. do they have to put casey on the stand? you would normally put the client on the stand. you have no burden but when you assume that, it s just a huge error. in order to prove it, in order to prove your case and have a closing argument based on opening you would have to call your client to say you know what? it was an accident. she drowned that. is not going to happen. the prosecution isn t is a fix here, closing arguments they re going to say this is how the case started. grandma called the police saying there is something
diatomes you don t know what that means. it may have been in the soil. may have been in another body of water long before the incident occurred so have you to understand what the answer means. okay. all right. thank you very much, doctor hunter for being with us this evening. now, let s bring in our legal panel. former prosecutor ann bremner, florida attorney diana temis, and bernie grim. now, ann you re the prosecutor. we re 10 days into the defense case. what have they proven other than maybe the family is dysfunctional? what is that saying? fault in one, fault in all, you know it. it s the whole case. apple doesn t fall far from the tree. casey and cindy. but then, let s just go back to the premise of the prosecution case. and the defense. if this is
baid job in this case. i think he s doing the best he has with the hand he was dealt with and he s been dealt with a dishonest client and doing whatever he can to save this girl s life. all right, bernie. is he doing a good job? jaes yeah? he s doing the best he can. everyone will agree with you. we can sit here and criticize, stand up and be in the courtroom with all of those facts against you. try to do the job he s doing. it is hard. right after the break, more with our legal panel as they react to today s emotional testimony fromรง the brother of casey anthony. will it impact the jury? more of our two-hour casey anthony special, next.