on appeal. it s new evidence. the defense didn t get to watch it happened. and defense attorney mark geragos asked to rebut it, and he was refused that request. on appeal, this is a live issue. unless it s harmless error, this could set scott peterson free, at least for a new trial. all right, bernie, if it is accepted as a valuable piece of evidence, how long does the process take, for the judge to get through it, consider the objections? sure. the state gets to file a reply brief to this brief, and then the petitioner, scott peterson, then gets to file another brief, a reply. jim would know how far the argument would be better. if i was scott peterson, these two jurors could have punched his tickets how do you get in a trailer that s in a garage to check buoyancesy. you can t check buoyancy on land, can you? if i was the defense
you, greta raised a very good issue, one of the issues that should be on appeal, there was no blood. really in this case there was a lack of real physical evidence. circumstantial evidence is the thing that really convicted scott peterson in this case. the body was found in san francisco bay, the same bay that he went fishing. well, but, bernie, from a lot of folks from the outside, i know you re a defense attorney, but from the outside looking in, there s too much coincidence, that scott had been fishing there. the coincidence is overwhelming. there s a better chance i ll walk out of here and win the lottery and split it with ted. that s how rare it is. i didn t even get a chance that being said, the dog evidence is completely unreliable, because the judge instructed the jury you can t convict mr. peterson based on dog evidence, but you can convict him if there s other evidence in addition to it. that, i think, is a problem for them. and i think jim knows, you can t jim actual
you, greta raised a very good issue, one of the issues that should be on appeal, there was no blood. really in this case there was a lack of real physical evidence. circumstantial evidence is the thing that really convicted scott peterson in this case. the body was found in san francisco bay, the same bay that he went fishing. well, but, bernie, from a lot of folks from the outside, i know you re a defense attorney, but from the outside looking in, there s too much coincidence, that scott had been fishing there. the coincidence is overwhelming. there s a better chance i ll walk out of here and win the lottery and split it with ted. that s how rare it is. i didn t even get a chance that being said, the dog evidence is completely unreliable, because the judge instructed the jury you can t convict mr. peterson based on dog evidence, but you can convict him if there s other evidence in addition to it. that, i think, is a problem for them. and i think jim knows, you
eight years, this is a problem on appeal. it s new evidence. the defense didn t get to watch it happened. and defense attorney mark geragos asked to rebut it, and he was refused that request. on appeal, this is a live issue. unless it s harmless error, this could set scott peterson free, at least for a new trial. all right, bernie, if it is accepted as a valuable piece of evidence, how long does the process take, for the judge to get through it, consider the objections? sure. the state gets to file a reply brief to this brief, and then the petitioner, scott peterson, then gets to file another brief, a reply. jim would know how far the argument would be better. if i was scott peterson, these two jurors could have punched his tickets how do you get in a trailer that s in a garage to check buoyancesy. you can t check buoyancy on land, can you? if i was the defense
attorney, appellate attorney in this case, i would sent greta van sustern flowers tonight. that juror said, don t rock the boat, baby. they rocked the boat, experimented with it, and this case could be reversed on that and that alone. we ll make sure greta gets the flowers. she s a professional. he will be convicted on a retrial, that s for sure. we ll have to see if he gets the new trial, where it goes from there. jim, bernie and ted, thank you so much. sure. straight ahead, news about jobs. it s not exactly good. what does the latest jobs report mean for the millions of americans still looking for work and for the rest of our economy. steve ford is here next. also it was the verdict that stunned the nation. casey anthony acquitted of murdering her little daughter.