third time we usedded it to. we can t trust these people bernard, what about israel. my biggest concern, netanyahu overplayed his hanbey what he did but israel has a loss to lose here but one of the major issues we ll have to deal with, post a deal, assuming we get a deal is ensuring iran does not use the new-found economic freedom, to fund proxy wars and we have to engage in hard tactics to ensure that does not happen. have to wrap it up there. breaking news happening. thank you. fox news alert. another huge breaking story. police in new york city breaking up a suspected terror plot two women charged with planning an attack on u.s. soil. weapons of mass destruction like the boston bombing. details next. n up! i m re-workin the menu. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals antioxidants and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®.
kissinger in the opera, nixon in china. slow down and let s see. bernard? how do we trust iran. they re still busy with terrorism. that s the question. it s not a good country. they re a state sponsor of terrorisms. bernard, why trust them? use the quote from one of my not so favorite presidents but my favorite line, trust but verify. that s what ronald reagan said. that s the centerpiece of the deal and the president laid out a persuasive case. we cannot allow iran to build a nuclear weapon. so we can go forward with the deal, making sure that we have full transparency, unfettered access inspection, and so fort, guaranteed by not just the united states but by six major world powers, or bomb iran and bomb the nuclear program back a few years. the latter option would be extraordinarily dangerous. the first option is preferred, but by no means assured, and i think we ll have to use congress
that was from president obama a few moments ago in the rose garden speaking before the parameters of the iran deal. joining me now our political power panel bernard witman, and mark larson. thank you for switching gears on this topic. we just had bill o reilly in here. he said we have to let this sit, give it time, let the president go to congress, see that they have to say about it. what do you say? i m all for giving more time here. i thought for a moment i was watching president frank underwood. i have been binge watching house of cards and with hap binge-watching the negotiation. the whole issue of slowing down is a great idea. the president likes to say it s either/or. one point he said it s a good deal. same thing he said about health care. we ll see. there s a point where you say, why the urgency, because john kerry wants to be nixon or
say eventually they ll get sued, but that s small consolation to the people who could get sick and died as a result of lax safety and inspection standards in china. the government is good at inspecting? no. it seems like the marketplace catches it more than the government inspectors to, which is my point. are you ready to eat some smithfield bacon, john? i m a good southern boy, but i m not so sure i want it coming from china. that s why you put quality controls on stuff coming in. this is opening up for us to send beef on china as well. that s what happens in a global economy. i think with quality control we ll be ok. thanks, guys. and thanks to bernard for joining us. we appreciate it. what this high school football coach did to his team that someone here says americans should do to d.c.
things will continue. yes, the department of education will be closed. you might not get to visit yellow stone national park. so you might have to wait a couple of weeks for a visa. those things will slow down. but the last time we had any length closure in the mid 90s, about 21 days, guess what gdp did? it rose. and the stock market flat for those 21 days. and then it went up to 7.2% gdp. bernard, no deal is a big deal? gary is living in a fantasiland. the economy last i checked wasn t what it was in 95. gdp will get cut in half. growth falls to 1.57%. if it s closed for a month, we enter a recession for the quarter. it would be a complete disaster. why? hundreds of thousand sais of employees, no paycheck. active duty military personnel who are fighting and giving