Not really about any Government Spending or anything that would actually produce any infrastructure at all. And so im kind of eager to get to infrastructure week. I have a funny feeling we never will. I have a funny feeling the rhythm of this isnt going to allow us to get there. It stands in for this idea that the Trump Administration is eager to work on policy issues, particularly those on which there might be areas of agreement with democrats. Like, its a its a little avatar that means that. And they dont mean any of that, and so they just pop the avatar up there whenever they want you to stop talking about whatever else is actually going on in the administration. But its like this little kind of puppet that they take out whenever they want to seem like there is somebody who theyre not. Yeah, as far as i can tell so far, theres not one sentence of agreement on what infrastructure legislation would be between democrats and donald trump. Absolutely. Yeah. Thank you very much, rachel. T
Yeah. Sorry about the makeup on the collar. So if we ever if we ever get to infrastructure week uhhuh. Its going to be really interesting. Because it isnt about infrastructure. Its all about the trump version of this, of course, is all about really big tax breaks to pavement companies. To companies that are in the roadbuilding business, and its not really about any Government Spending or anything that would actually produce any infrastructure at all. And so im kind of eager to get to infrastructure week. I have a funny feeling we never will. I have a funny feeling the rhythm of this isnt going to allow us to get there. It stands in for this idea that the Trump Administration is eager to work on policy issues, particularly those on which there might be areas of agreement with democrats. Like, its a its a little avatar that means that. And they dont mean any of that, and so they just pop the avatar up there whenever they want you to stop talking about whatever else is actually going on i
Thanks for returning that blue blazer to my closet from last night. Yeah. Sorry about the makeup on the collar. So if we ever if we ever get to infrastructure week uhhuh. Its going to be really interesting. Because it isnt about infrastructure. Its all about the trump version of this, of course, is all about really big tax breaks to pavement companies. To companies that are in the roadbuilding business, and its not really about any Government Spending or anything that would actually produce any infrastructure at all. And so im kind of eager to get to infrastructure week. I have a funny feeling we never will. I have a funny feeling the rhythm of this isnt going to allow us to get there. It stands in for this idea that the Trump Administration is eager to work on policy issues, particularly those on which there might be areas of agreement with democrats. Like, its a its a little avatar that means that. And they dont mean any of that, and so they just pop the avatar up there whenever they
democrats investigating this or mueller giving us some more information, we will get the truth of what really happened. and that will be the issue, not how it was covered. and elizabeth drew, it might be benton bradley who has the very best line about how people out there and editors in these situations should regard developments like this after reviewing how the mistake was made by woodward and bernstein. he had a few words with them about, you know, how they needed to clean up their processes, make sure this would never happen again. and it didn t ever happen again. but he finished that discussion by saying to them, what have you got for tomorrow? and that s what really matters, isn t it? that s right. tomorrow is another day. and another story. and other stories. and i agree with who was just talking these things happen. they don t happen the amazing thing is, they don t happen very often. i want to point something else out. in watergate, we had no cable. we had no interne
and it s a pity that now we are being distracted by what might have been a mistake by buzzfeed or might be an unclear statement by mueller. but i think at the end of the day, whether we have house democrats investigating this or mueller giving us some more information, we will get the truth of what really happened. and that will be the issue, not how it was covered. and elizabeth drew, it might be benton bradley who has the very best line about how people out there and editors in these situations should regard developments like this after reviewing how the mistake was made by woodward and bernstein. he had a few words with them about, you know, how they needed to clean up their processes,