understand and deal with the grief. very well put. does anybody here believe that s a real possibility? in the block we had with catherine herridge, it is a possibility the flight landed based on the information you had about the elt system. still, even with that, i don t know. i think the idea of putting that out there and not having it said that that is probably the least likely possibility or something, but if you re a relative of a passenger, you re going to grab hold of that and say, gee, i hope that s a real possibility. don t you think, greg? i mean, in your head, you have to ask, whatever you say, will that add or subtract to a person s suffering. stuff like that, that s why i usually shut up, because i can t imagine me saying anything that could offer comfort to somebody in any of this, because i can t i can t imagine what they re going through. they have thrown the family members the wolves here. yeah, i think they should not have an opinion until they have any
understand it. that means either a massive explosion blew it apart, which means you would have seen debris around, or how do you explain it? i m impressed with your research. thank you. you re welcome. it s a point a lot of people have missed. what we have heard consistently in the past 12 days is there s no evidence that the flight went down, and bob has hit on one of those important data points, which is that this elt, this is an emergency landing transmitter. it s designed to go off. it s in typically the tail and nose of the aircraft. it s designed to go off when you hit land or when you hit the water. and this transmission, this sort of ticker system, has not been discerned, so it s this absence of information which suggests that the plane has not gone down. and one of the issues that bob has also raised here is there was a warning that there could be a malfunction with this elt system on the 777, but the malaysian authorities have said