and he listens to them well. and he asks them tough questions, and he is approaching this as methodically as anybody i know. you know, back in the 1950s, sam le bell one of the great political scientists of all time was at election night with a whole bunch of academics who were shocked that eisenhower won over stevenson and walked around the room and not a single person in the room had voted for eisenhower, and he said, guys, this is a sign of how big the gap is in america. i understand that. okay. mitt romney is a lot like eisenhower, and he is a very good organizer and methodical person and prepared to systematically do what he thinks is right for the country, and i think that he might make a surprisingly good president. that where it gets to me, because eisenhower received the nazi surrender and won the war in europe and kept us out of the indo-china war and out of lebanon and the suez canal, and that is about it, but a man of