but i think the way you set the argument at the begining is what it s all about. it s about him. he sets it in terms of his even presence. you re loyal to him. you are loyal to what his efforts, his words are. and that has begun to take its toll inside the party. i think you find now a number of republicans who are really asking themselves, is this what republicanism is or going to be in the 21st century. has it changed so much that the very things we once stood for, law and order, not with a stick, but respecting the constitution and the principles that come with that. are we really pro family? as we ve seen over the last few weeks, the struggle on that issue for a lot of republicans. so thissfrom has been really pushed the test for republicanism in the 21st century to mean something other than what we thought it was when we began this century. kimberly, there are a lot of people in the president s base, it s about time someone stood
think about this.1 in the context of a presidential election. targeting donald trump who becomes president. all right, as we move on. he will be called to testify before congress and the house judiciary is ready to issue a subpoena. my prediction he ain t going to talk. he will join us in a few minutes. and we know strzok is the tip of the fbi high level corruption. the ig referred 5 for pending action. this is begining to collapse. people will go to jail over this. this.11 this.111 we are learning another wrinkle in the deep state surrounding christopher steele. the foreign spy whom the clinton
judiciary chairman is ready to issue a subpoena. my prediction he ain t going to talk. he will join us in a few minutes. and we know strzok is the tip of the fbi high level corruption. t the ig referred 5 for pending action. this is begining to collapse. people will go to jail over this. we are learning another wrinkle in the deep state surrounding christopher steele. the foreign spy whom the clinton campaign paid for to produce phoney russian lies against trump, steele, he was welcomed at obama s state department just days before the 2016 election where he allegedly briefed
a day or two he was in front of lawmakers and he said obviously we have gone through every single strategy, we have done that since day one. with rerocking and rolling we are rocking and rolling and fully prepared. he was laughing and insulted by it. the idea they are not prepared. do you think he is not credible on that level as someone look at his record. i think from the very beginning you mentioned rocket man. i think that was part of the strategy. this is a long-term mark he is playing. the real unknown factor in this is what china s intentions are. china want us out of the region. they want us out of japan and out of south korea. that is what their definition of denuclearizing the zone looks like. melissa: get america out. we are not going to play that game. i think yesterday with the letter trump was as much redefining what the rules would be about the negotiation as anything else. in other words, you are not pulling one over on us we are going to take care of business
and highly racially divisive statement, and it is a curious pick on donald trump s part to put jeff sessions in for that reason. yes sh, he was loyal to donald trump, an incredibly loyal, but he is also being named attorney general, and it is going to be raising some challenges for jeff sessions if he does assume the office. and to that point of the loyal i, the hari, if we look at who walked through the door, will burr ross, one of the few fortune 500 leaders and billionaires and there from the begining for donald trump, and proving loyalty and could prove to be a secretary of commerce for him, and what does that mean if a wilburr ross appointment? well, if he is going to be draining the swamp, what we have seen is that he has filled the administration with lobbyists, around corporate billionaires